• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. SENSAR IOL; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. SENSAR IOL; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number AR40M
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Capsular Bag Tear (2639)
Date of Event 12/16/2021
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Unknown/ not provided.If implanted, date: not applicable, as lens was removed during the same procedure.If explanted, date: not applicable, as lens was removed during the same procedure.The device is not received; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device/lot history record and complaint trending for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.Attempts have been made to obtain missing information; however, no definitive response has been received.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that an intraocular lens (iol) was fully inserted into the patient left eye but capsule tear noticed.It was learned that the patient left aphakic and asked to come back later.There was no vitrectomy, incision enlargement, or sutures done.About 5 days later the patient came back and was supposed to get a 3-piece lens, but that also did not work.The procedure was aborted both days.There was no information of the product identifiers for the replacement 3-pc.Lens.The patient has been referred to a retina specialist.No other information was provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section d9.Device available for evaluation? yes.Returned to manufacturer on: jan.14, 2022.Section h3.Device evaluated manufacturer? yes.Device evaluation: visual inspection under magnification revealed viscoelastic residue on the optic body and haptic and that the lens had a cut to the optic body as well as a detached haptic, which is consistent with a lens that was handled during removal.Based on the return condition of the lens, no further product evaluation could be performed.The complaint issue could not be confirmed, and no product deficiency could be identified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SENSAR IOL
Common Device Name
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key13311361
Report Number3012236936-2022-00165
Device Sequence Number14685949
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier05050474501812
UDI-Public(01)05050474501812(17)260313
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateWI
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility,Distributor
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 02/22/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/13/2026
Device Model NumberAR40M
Device Catalogue NumberAR40MN0010
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/14/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 12/30/2021
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer02/22/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date01/20/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date02/22/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/13/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Other;
Patient Age67 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-