|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is in-conclusive, no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-may-2014) is considered to be a best estimate.Updated fields: a2, b2, b3, b4, b5, b6, b7, d4 (product catalog no., corporate lot no, expiry date, udi no.), d6b (date of explant), g3, g6, h2, h4, h6, h10.Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol ventrio st on (b)(6) 2015.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the ventrio st.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2015 - patient was diagnosed with large incisional hernia with multiple defects thereby underwent open repair with implant of ventrio st mesh.Per operative notes, ¿old scar was excised and large defect was noted.The contents were freed and large ventrio st mesh was placed around the defect and sutured circumferentially.¿ (b)(6) 2016 - patient was diagnosed with painful cystic mass of abdominal mass with fat necrosis with rolled mesh thereby underwent open repair with removal of mesh.Per operative notes, ¿ old scar with seroma was noted and drained.The fat necrosis with rolled mesh was removed.The defect was repaired with sutures.¿.
|