• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. POD PACKING COIL; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. POD PACKING COIL; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Model Number RBYPODJ30-A
Device Problems Break (1069); Failure to Fold (1255)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 12/28/2021
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation of the returned pod packing coil could not confirm that the embolization coil fractured during the procedure.Evaluation revealed that the distal tip of the embolization coil was present.This indicates that none of the embolization coil was left in the vessel as mentioned in the complaint.Therefore, the root cause of the reported complaint could not be determined.Further evaluation revealed pusher assembly kinks throughout its length, and offset coil winds throughout the length of the embolization coil.The offset coil winds may have prevented the embolization coil from taking shape in vessel during the procedure.The pusher assembly kinks were incidental to the reported complaint and may have occurred during packaging for return.Due to the returned condition, the pod packing coil could not be functionally tested.Penumbra coils are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the iliolumbar artery using pod packing coils (pod pcs), ruby coils and a lantern delivery microcatheter (lantern).During the procedure, the physician placed several ruby coils and pod pcs in the target location using the lantern.While attempting to place the next pod pc into the target vessel, the pod pc would not form initially and stayed straight before starting to form.While continuing to advance the pod pc, the embolization coil broke.It was reported that the physician was able to remove approximately 10 cm of the coil by retracting the pusher assembly and the remaining 20 cm of the pod pc was left in the patient¿s vessel.The procedure was completed by using additional coils and the same lantern.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
POD PACKING COIL
Type of Device
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key13338169
MDR Text Key287420764
Report Number3005168196-2022-00022
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00814548017655
UDI-Public00814548017655
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K170852
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/01/2005,01/24/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/24/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberRBYPODJ30-A
Device Catalogue NumberRBYPODJ30
Device Lot NumberF92770
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/29/2021
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Date Manufacturer Received12/28/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/28/2019
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age79 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-