• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO MANUFACTURING NETHERLANDS TECNIS IOL; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO MANUFACTURING NETHERLANDS TECNIS IOL; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number ZCU225
Medical Device Problem Code Scratched Material (3020)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 09/02/2021
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
If implanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced during the same procedure.If explanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced during the same procedure.The device was not returned for analysis, therefore a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.Attempts have been made to obtain missing information; however, no definitive response has been received.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that an intraocular lens (iol) was scratched.The lens touched the eye and was removed and replaced in the same procedure.The outcome did not significantly interfere with activities of daily life.The patient has recovered.No additional information was provided to johnson & johnson surgical vision.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Product investigation was received, and the following fields were updated accordingly: section d-9: device available for evaluation: yes section d-9: date returned to manufacturer: 04-feb-2022 section h-3: device evaluated by manufacturer: yes device evaluation: visual inspection under magnification revealed no initial issues with the lens.The lens was cleaned, and small scratches could be seen on the lens.No further issues were identified.The complaint issue could be confirmed; however, it may be attributed to handling during implantation and/or removal and cannot be confirmed to be related to a manufacturing issue.Therefore, no product deficiency could be identified.Conclusion: based on the investigation results, there is no indication of a product malfunction or product quality deficiency.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS IOL
Common Device Name
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO MANUFACTURING NETHERLANDS
van swietenlaan 5
groningen, groningen 9728 NX
NL  9728 NX
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key13347589
Report Number3012236936-2022-00214
Device Sequence Number4646078
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier05050474659025
UDI-Public(01)05050474659025(17)241127
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateMN
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility,Distributor
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 03/29/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/27/2024
Device Model NumberZCU225
Device Catalogue NumberZCU225U225
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 01/03/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer03/25/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date01/25/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date03/29/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/27/2019
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexMale
-
-