|
|
| Model Number |
71800010 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Fracture (1260)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Failure of Implant (1924); Pain (1994); Deformity/ Disfigurement (2360)
|
| Date of Event |
12/21/2021
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Internal complaint reference: case-(b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It is reported that, after an internal fixation surgery was performed on (b)(6) 2021, the patient attended the hospital because of pain and deformity.After evaluation, it was found that the 4.5mm l-d fem lk pl10h l 230mm is broken.A revision surgery has not been performed.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H3, h6: the device was not returned for evaluation but the pictures were reviewed, and the fracture was confirmed.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that, this case reports, following an internal fixation surgery on 10-9-2021, it was reported the patient attended the institute for of pain and deformity.After evaluation, it was found that the 4.5mm l-d fem lk pl10h l 230mm was fractured.Three x-ray photos dated (b)(6) 2021, revealed a distal femoral fracture no comparison image post implant was provided to understand how much of this fracture is persistent from the original.Per subsequent e-mail, the patient was complaint with the rehab plan.A revision surgery was set for (b)(6) 2022, that has not been performed.¿all documents and images provided as of this date have been reviewed and considered and unless noted do not contribute to the clinical/medical investigation¿.A review of the manufacturing records did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.A review of complaint history for the part number over the past 12 months and for the batch number based on historical data of the device did not reveal similar events for the listed device.A review of the risk management file and instructions for use documents revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.A historical review concluded that there are no prior actions related to this product and event.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.Some potential probable causes for this event could include but not limited to traumatic injury or surgical technique.The contribution of the device to the reported incident could be corroborated as the device was found to be broken in an evaluation.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H3, h6: the associated device was returned and evaluated.A visual inspection of the returned device confirmed the stated failure mode.The device was found to be fractured along the middle of the device, rendering the device inoperative.Both of the fractured components were returned.A review of complaint history for the part number over the past 12 months and for the batch number based on historical data of the device did not reveal similar events for the listed device.The clinical/medical evaluation concluded that the three provided x-ray photos dated (b)(6) 2021, approximately three months after the patient¿s internal fixation surgery, revealed distal femoral fracture.However, without the requested clinical information, the root cause of the reported fracture cannot be definitively concluded based on the provided information.The planned revision surgery has not been performed.According to the report, the pain is still in pain.Should any additional relevant patient information be provided this case would be re-assessed.A review of the manufacturing records did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.At this time, we do not have reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.A review of the risk management file and instructions for use document revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.Assessment of historical escalated cases concluded that there are no prior actions related to this device and failure mode.A contribution of the device to the reported event could be corroborated as the device shows signs of damage/wear.Possible causes could include but not limited to traumatic injury, patient anatomy or abnormal loading of limb.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|