• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO MANUFACTURING NETHERLANDS TECNIS IOL; EXTENDED DEPTH OF FOCUS INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO MANUFACTURING NETHERLANDS TECNIS IOL; EXTENDED DEPTH OF FOCUS INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number ZXT225
Medical Device Problem Code Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Visual Disturbances (2140); Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available (4581)
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that an intraocular lens (iol) was explanted from the patient's operative eye due to severe glare issue and a dislocated iol.A vitrectomy was not required; however, a suture was used to close the wound.A non-johnson & johnson lens was successfully implanted as a replacement lens.No further information is available.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Weight/ethnicity: information unknown/not provided.Information was asked but it was unavailable.Date of event: unknown/asked but unavailable.(b)(4).All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: section d9: device available for evaluation? yes.Section d9: returned to manufacturer on: 2/14/2022.Section h3: device evaluated by manufacturer¿ yes.Device evaluation: the complaint lens was received inside a non-jnj sterilization pouch.Visual inspection under magnification revealed that the lens was received with a detached haptic, which is consistent with a lens that was handled during explant.The lens was cleaned, and a cut on the optic body was identified.No issues related to or could have contributed to visual issues were observed.Based on the return condition of the lens, the complaint issues could not be identified, and no product deficiency could be identified.Manufacturing record review: the manufacturing records for the intraocular lens were reviewed.The product was manufactured according to specifications.The search revealed that no similar complaint for this production order number has been received.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency and the reported issue could not be confirmed.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS IOL
Common Device Name
EXTENDED DEPTH OF FOCUS INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO MANUFACTURING NETHERLANDS
van swietenlaan 5
groningen, groningen 9728 NX
NL  9728 NX
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key13388911
Report Number3012236936-2022-00244
Device Sequence Number4897934
Product Code POE
UDI-Device Identifier05050474605817
UDI-Public(01)05050474605817(17)220303
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateNJ
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2020
Device Explanted Year2021
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 03/31/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/03/2022
Device Model NumberZXT225
Device Catalogue NumberZXT225U210
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 01/05/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer03/10/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date01/28/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date04/01/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/03/2017
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age65 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-