• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS Back to Search Results
Model Number DIU150
Medical Device Problem Codes Material Fragmentation (1261); Inaccurate Delivery (2339); Mechanical Jam (2983)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 01/18/2022
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Patient weight: not applicable as there was no patient contact.Date implanted: not applicable as the iol was not implanted.Date explanted: not applicable as the iol was not implanted.The device was not returned for analysis.Therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the pre-loaded intraocular lens (iol) did not deploy correctly from the cartridge as the iol stuck to the cartridge.Account provided that the haptic tore off while trying to push the lens through.Further follow-up with the account confirmed that there was no patient contact and the iol failed to load during the preparation stage as the inserter rod passed over the iol in the cartridge.A back-up iol with the same model and diopter size was used to complete the procedure.No further information is available.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Product investigation was received, and the following fields were updated accordingly: section d-9: device available for evaluation: yes.Section d-9: date returned to manufacturer: 04-feb-2022.Section h-3: device evaluated by manufacturer: yes.Device evaluation: visual inspection under magnification revealed that the handpiece was received with cartridge damage that is consistent with a cartridge that had a portion of the tube and the tip removed.Further observation revealed that the lens was received stuck inside of the cartridge.The handpiece was disassembled, and the assembly was inspected, no assembly issues were identified, and no detached haptics were identified.The iol could not be removed without damaging the lens, therefore no product evaluation could be performed on the lens.The complaint issues could not be confirmed, and no product deficiency could be identified.Conclusion: based on the investigation results, there is no indication of a product malfunction or product quality deficiency.The reported issue was not verified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS IOL
Common Device Name
LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key13389356
Report Number3012236936-2022-00225
Device Sequence Number19261294
Product Code MJP
UDI-Device Identifier05050474746596
UDI-Public(01)05050474746596(17)241031
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateFL
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 03/29/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/31/2024
Device Model NumberDIU150
Device Catalogue NumberDIU150U225
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 01/18/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer03/29/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date01/28/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date03/29/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/31/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexFemale
Patient EthnicityNon Hispanic
Patient RaceWhite
-
-