|
As the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history record is currently being performed.The sample was not returned to the manufacturer for inspection/evaluation.Therefore, the investigation of the reported event is inconclusive.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause for this event is unknown.The instructions for use (ifu) is adequate for the reported device/patient code(s) and provides general instructions for use, as well as warnings, precautions and potential complications associated with the device.Upon receipt of new or additional information, a follow-up report will be submitted as applicable.(expiry date: 04/2024).Device not returned.
|
|
H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not required as this is the only complaint reported to date for this product and lot.Investigation summary: one atlas gold pta dilatation catheter was returned for evaluation.During visual evaluation, the catheter was received with a cordis unknown fr sheath loaded onto the catheter shaft.The distal tip of the introducer sheath was buckled.No kinks noted to the catheter shaft.The balloon was broken at the weld, but still attached to the inner guidewire lumen.Frayed fibers and unraveling were also noted at the proximal end of the balloon and weld.No functional testing was performed due the nature and the condition of the complaint.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported balloon rupture as no objective evidence of rupture was seen.The investigation is confirmed for the reported difficult to remove as the catheter was received with a cordis unknown fr sheath loaded onto the catheter shaft.The investigation is confirmed for the identified break as the balloon was broken at the weld, but still attached to the inner guidewire lumen.The investigation is confirmed for the identified unraveling and material frayed as frayed fibers and unraveled material were noted at the proximal end of the balloon and weld.A definitive root cause for the reported balloon rupture, difficult to remove and identified break, unraveled material and material frayed could not be determined based upon the provided information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G., procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H11:section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : see h10.
|