| Model Number |
SMXP140RH |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Rupture (1546)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Deformity/ Disfigurement (2360)
|
| Date of Event |
08/12/2021
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The mentor failure analysis lab has received the device for evaluation.The analysis has begun but is not complete at this time.When the investigational analysis has been completed, a supplemental report will be submitted.A manufacturing record evaluation (mre) was performed, and no anomalies were found related to this complaint.In addition, the mre verifies that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specification and procedures.Reason for device explant and/or reoperation: deflation.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a (b)(6) caucasian female patient underwent a primary breast reconstruction surgery with a 600cc artoura breast tissue expander and experienced a deflation on the left side post-operatively, which was confirmed via an office exam.As a result, the patient underwent explantation on (b)(6) 2022.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The mentor failure analysis lab has received the device for evaluation.The analysis has begun but is not complete at this time.When the investigational analysis has been completed, a supplemental report will be submitted.A manufacturing record evaluation (mre) was performed, and no anomalies were found related to this complaint.In addition, the mre verifies that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specification and procedures.Reason for device explant and/or reoperation: deflation.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a (b)(6) caucasian female patient underwent a primary breast reconstruction surgery with a 600cc artoura breast tissue expander and experienced a deflation on the left side post-operatively, which was confirmed via an office exam.As a result, the patient underwent explantation on (b)(6) 2022.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
On (b)(6) 2022, mentor received an updated serial number for the device.On (b)(6) 2022, mentor completed evaluation of the device.Device evaluation summary: during the visual evaluation of the tissue expander, the tear was not identified.As a result, leak testing was performed in accordance with mentor procedures, and a tear was identified at the 6 o¿clock position.When evaluated under a microscope the tear pattern did not reveal parallel striations that are consistent with markings made by a sharp instrument.The results also confirmed that there were no abnormalities with the manufacturing of the tissue expander that would have impacted its performance.Therefore, we were unable to identify the root cause of this tear.As the authorization form for examination was not received the product evaluation was limited to non-destructive testing.We would like to assure you that mentor adheres to the highest standards of quality.Our quality assurance process is robust for every product we make and requires that each mentor product undergoes a stringent visual inspection and rigorous testing prior to shipment.In addition, we maintain a comprehensive quality assurance system that complies with the food and drug administration's (fda) good manufacturing practice regulations.Prior to shipping, our devices are checked to ensure that they satisfy these standards in accordance with these processes.We also closely and continually monitor and review the clinical performance and real-world evidence for all our products through clinical studies, registries, and post-market surveillance activities.Potential cause while deflation is historically the most common complication related to tissue expanders, the rate of deflation with mentor® tissue expanders remains very low.An incident of this nature may be the result of one or more of the following factors: over-inflation of the tissue expander, use of the tissue expander in emerging surgical techniques not identified in the instructions for use (ifu), continuous and sustained stresses to the tissue expander, vigorous body movement (e.G.Physical exercise) or excessive manipulation/ trauma in the region of the expander.At mentor, we are committed to delivering high-quality tissue expanders and an exceptional customer experience.We take your concerns seriously and would like to thank you for taking the time to provide us with the information that was critical for our investigation and our post-market surveillance.We have shared your experience with our research and development team as they consider all customer feedback and emerging surgical trends as they develop next-generation product designs and innovations.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|