• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CARL ZEISS MEDITEC PRODUCTION LLC CT LUCIA 602

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CARL ZEISS MEDITEC PRODUCTION LLC CT LUCIA 602 Back to Search Results
Model Number 003500-0050-672
Medical Device Problem Code Use of Device Problem (1670)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Visual Impairment (2138)
Date of Event 12/29/2021
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
During the processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient, and device information.It was reported after the implantation of a ct lucia 602 there was a kink in the haptic.Thus, the lens was removed and a backup lens was used to successfully complete the procedure.No adverse patient effects or clinically significant delay in procedure reported.The device history records were reviewed and there were no non-conformities or deviations noted during the manufacturing of the lenses that would have contributed to the nature of this complaint.Additionally, lenses are 100 % inspected before they leave our manufacturing site.Therefore, we are confident that the lens was processed per standard operation procedures and inspections and met all of the criteria for release.Additionally, there was no damage noted to the lens during preparation for use which suggest a product deficiency did not contribute to the reported issue.Damaged haptics are known to be caused by numerous factors including, but not limited to: loading strategy, lens placement technique, poor handling during folding and inserting, patient pathology.We have reviewed the information provided and at this time there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the manufacturing, design, or labeling of the device.It appears that the reported issue is linked to user error.However, the need to explant the lens is considered need for medical intervention in order to prevent and avoid permanent impairment or damage to a body structure.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that after a ct lucia 602 was implanted it was noticed there was a kink in the haptic.Thus, the lens was removed and a backup lens was used to successfully complete the procedure.No adverse patient effects or clinically significant delay in procedure reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CT LUCIA 602
Common Device Name
CT LUCIA 602
Manufacturer (Section D)
CARL ZEISS MEDITEC PRODUCTION LLC
1040 s vintage ave. bld. a
ontario CA 91761
Manufacturer (Section G)
CARL ZEISS MEDITEC PRODUCTION LLC
1040 s vintage ave. bld. a
ontario CA 91761
Manufacturer Contact
charlie ortiz
1040 s vintage ave. bld. a
ontario, CA 91761
9099065165
MDR Report Key13423813
Report Number3010126268-2022-00005
Device Sequence Number17487786
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier00843045100966
UDI-Public(01)00843045100966(17)260131
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateMS
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P100016-S008
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2021
Device Explanted Year2021
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 02/02/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/31/2025
Device Model Number003500-0050-672
Device Catalogue Number003500-0050-672
Device Lot Number3S201542
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 01/13/2021
Initial Report FDA Received Date02/02/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured11/13/2020
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient SexUnknown
-
-