• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP. SINGLE USE REPOSITIONABLE CLIP; SINGLE USE REPOSITIONAL CLIP

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP. SINGLE USE REPOSITIONABLE CLIP; SINGLE USE REPOSITIONAL CLIP Back to Search Results
Model Number HX-202LR
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding (1888); Perforation (2001)
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
It is reported in the literature titled ¿endoluminal vacuum closure of a duodenal perforation,¿ a patient experienced perforation on post-operative day one after closure of a mucosal defect (using an olympus coagrasper, and 12 quickclip pro endoclips) caused by an endoscopic mucosal resection (emr) procedure of a 35mm polypoid lesion on the posterior wall of the second portion of the duodenum.Case with patient identifier (b)(6) reports device: coagrasper.Case with patient identifier (b)(6) reports device: quickclip pro endoclips.This literature was a case report of one patient who underwent an endoscopic mucosal resection (emr procedure of a 35mm polypoid lesion on the posterior wall of the second portion of the duodenum.This was complicated by intra-procedural bleeding of 250ml blood loss.Blood loss was stopped with the use of epinephrine injection, and a coagrasper.The mucosal defect was then closed with 12 quickclip pro endoclips.The patient developed evidence of perforation on post-operative day one.The patient was taken back to surgery on this day and the area was irrigated and widely drained.Perforation closure was not attempted at this time due to severe thickening and friability of the duodenum.Over the next 48 hours, the patient worsened clinically.Repeat images indicated uncontrolled leakage.This was managed with radiologically placed drains.The patient continued to deteriorate.Urgent pancreaticoduodenectomy surgery was considered, however his tenuous condition predicted a poor outcome.Endoluminal vacuum therapy (evt) was placed post-operative day six in an attempt to control duodenal leakage and prevent surgery.The evt sponge was changed every 3-6 days depending on drain output and the ability to maintain suction.The wound vac (wv) was replaced six times over 31 days and was removed when there was evidence of circumferential adherence of the duodenum to the retroperitoneum and no drainage was present.The patient¿s final pathology confirmed tubular adenoma with focal high-grade dysplasia and clear margins.Surveillance esophagogastro- duodenoscopy (egd) at 12 months demonstrated complete closure of the defect with mild scarring and no evidence of residual or recurrent adenoma.There was no report of any olympus device malfunction in the procedure described in this study.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SINGLE USE REPOSITIONABLE CLIP
Common Device Name
SINGLE USE REPOSITIONAL CLIP
Manufacturer (Section D)
OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP.
2951 ishikawa-cho
hachioji-shi, tokyo-to 192-8 507
JA  192-8507
MDR Report Key13424165
Report Number2951238-2022-00311
Device Sequence Number17360222
Product Code PKL
UDI-Device Identifier04953170345142
UDI-Public04953170345142
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateCO
Initial Reporter CountryUS
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 02/02/2022
Report Date (Section F) 01/05/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberHX-202LR
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN-LITERATURE
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Distributor Facility Aware Date01/05/2022
Event Location Hospital
Date Report to Manufacturer01/05/2022
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer Not provided
Initial Report FDA Received Date02/02/2022
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
Concomitant Medical Products
and Therapy/Usage Dates
COAGRASPER.
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Other; Required Intervention;
Patient Age57 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-