• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SMART COIL; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SMART COIL; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Model Number 400SMTXSFT2H06
Medical Device Problem Codes Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012); Difficult or Delayed Separation (4044); Premature Separation (4045)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 01/09/2022
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation of the returned smart coil confirmed that the embolization coil was detached from the pusher assembly.Evaluation revealed that the pet lock was separated, and the pull wire was retracted from the pusher assembly ddt.The separated pet lock was likely due to the coil detachment attempted during the procedure.If the pet lock is separated, the pull wire will retract from the pusher assembly ddt, the embolization coil will detach from the pusher assembly.The detached embolization coil was not returned for evaluation.Further evaluation of the device revealed kinks on pusher assembly.This damage was likely incidental to the complaint.Penumbra coils are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Event or Problem Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the m1 segment of the middle cerebral artery (mca) using penumbra smart coils (smart coil), a penumbra smart coil detachment handle (handle), and a non-penumbra microcatheter.During the procedure, the physician advanced the smart coil into the aneurysm using the microcatheter and attempted to detach it using the handle; however, the smart coil failed to detach.The physician then decided to remove the smart coil.Upon retraction, the physician experienced resistance and noticed that the smart coil had unintentionally detached inside the microcatheter.Therefore, the physician used another smart coil to push the detached smart coil back into the aneurysm and implanted both smart coils successfully.The procedure was completed using additional smart coils and the same handle.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PENUMBRA SMART COIL
Common Device Name
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key13467370
Report Number3005168196-2022-00041
Device Sequence Number20142008
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00814548015330
UDI-Public00814548015330
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateCO
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K160832
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2022
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 02/06/2022
Report Date (Section F) 01/01/2005
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/04/2026
Device Model Number400SMTXSFT2H06
Device Catalogue Number400SMTXSFT2H06
Device Lot NumberF105147
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/25/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 01/10/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date02/06/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/05/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
-
-