• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 ULTRA, 23MM; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 ULTRA, 23MM; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED Back to Search Results
Model Number 9750TFX23
Device Problem Contamination (1120)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 01/13/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation is ongoing.
 
Event Description
As reported by our (b)(6), during preparation of a 23mm sapien 3 ultra valve, a black spot was noted on one of the valve leaflets after the second rinse was completed and the valve was released from the protective cage.The black spot could not be removed after vigorous rinsing or when touched lightly with a sterile gloved finger., a new sapien 3 ultra valve was used, and the valve was successfully deployed.Per report, the valve prep station is a separate working area and specifically kept clean and away from the scrub 'trolley', which can have plenty of blood present.The potential defect on the valve was noticed as soon as its protective white frame was removed.It appeared that the dot was within the valve itself.It was noted that the dot appeared to look different once the image was zoomed.The thread like tail was not originally visible.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation is ongoing.
 
Event Description
As reported by our (b)(4) affiliate, during preparation of a 23mm sapien 3 ultra valve, a black spot was noted on one of the valve leaflets after the second rinse was completed and the valve was released from the protective cage.The black spot could not be removed after vigorous rinsing or when touched lightly with a sterile gloved finger., a new sapien 3 ultra valve was used, and the valve was successfully deployed.Per report, the valve prep station is a separate working area and specifically kept clean and away from the scrub 'trolley', which can have plenty of blood present.The potential defect on the valve was noticed as soon as its protective white frame was removed.It appeared that the dot was within the valve itself.It was noted that the dot appeared to look different once the image was zoomed.The thread like tail was not originally visible.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The 23mm sapien ultra valve was returned to edwards for evaluation.Visual inspection revealed the following: one (1) black fiber was observed on cp2 leaflet inflow side.Functional or dimensional testing performed as the evaluation is based on visual and material analysis.Material analysis was performed on the isolated material collected during product evaluation.Ftir results for the reported particulates show similar absorption characteristic when compared to cellulose like material.A review of manufacturing process was performed to determine if the particulate originated at edwards facility.A listing of all the tooling, fixtures and material used in the manufacturing line of 9750tfx valve were generated and reviewed.Based on the review, there was no similar material for cellulose used during manufacturing process.Additional review of all the tools/fixtures/workstations, indicated they were properly maintained in cleanroom during the walk-through.The operators were properly gowned with hair covers, shoe covers, and cleanroom gowns as observed during cleanroom review.There was no observation of non-conformance or abnormality.See manufacturing investigation report for manufacturing walkthrough.Therefore, it is not confirmed that the cellulose like material collected during evaluation originated from the thv manufacturing process at edwards singapore facility.During the manufacturing process, all inspections are conducted on 100% of the units.Device history record (dhr) review was performed and did not reveal any manufacturing non-conformance that would have contributed to the complaint event.A lot history record review was performed and did not reveal any related complaints.The commander delivery system with s3/s3u ifu and device preparation training manual was reviewed for instructions and guidance.A review of edwards lifesciences risk management documentation was performed for this case.The reported event is an anticipated risk of the transcatheter heart valve procedure, additional assessment of the failure mode is not required at this time.The complaint for particulate was confirmed from the evaluation of the returned valve.A review of dhr, lot history, complaint history, and manufacturing mitigation did not provide any indications that a manufacturing non-conformance would have contributed to the complaint.Per ftir material analysis results, the black particulates showed similar absorption to cellulose material.Process walk through was performed by manufacturing.Process walk through was performed by manufacturing to ensure none of the material, fixtures, or tooling used match black cellulose material.Additionally, during manufacturing process, all sapien 3 ultra valves are 100% visually inspected for particulate.Therefore, it is highly unlikely that a manufacturing defect contributed to the event.No labeling/ ifu deficiencies were identified during evaluation.As reported, 'during the preparation, a black spot was noted on the valve leaflet.This was seen after the second rinse was completed and the valve was released from the protective cage.The black spot would not come away after vigorous rinsing or when touched lightly with a sterile gloved finger.As an action, a new sapien 3 ultra valve was used and successfully deployed.' it is possible that the black particulate was introduced during device preparation, as it was observed during the valve rinsing process.In this case, available information suggests that procedural factors (device prepping handling) may contributed to the complaint event.However, a conclusive root cause is unable to be determined at this time.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits monthly, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.No ifu/labeling/training manual inadequacies were identified.Therefore, no corrective or preventative action nor pra is required.There is no confirmation that the black particulate originated from edwards.However, as precautionary measures, an awareness communication emphasizing the importance of in-process mitigation on foreign particulate during manufacturing was performed in edwards facility.Awareness communication is included as part of manufacturing investigation report.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 ULTRA, 23MM
Type of Device
AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
renee van dorne
1 edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
9492506385
MDR Report Key13472317
MDR Text Key285746126
Report Number2015691-2022-03765
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NPT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P140031
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/12/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/28/2023
Device Model Number9750TFX23
Device Catalogue Number9750TFX23A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/13/2022
Initial Date FDA Received02/07/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received04/08/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received04/12/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/28/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-