• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG PROGAV 2.0 W. PED. CONTROL RES.; HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG PROGAV 2.0 W. PED. CONTROL RES.; HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT Back to Search Results
Model Number FX670T
Medical Device Problem Codes Mechanical Problem (1384); Infusion or Flow Problem (2964)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Hydrocephalus (3272)
Date of Event 01/06/2022
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that a progav 2.0 (part # fx670t) was implanted during a procedure performed on (b)(6) 2019.According to the complainant, the shunt system was believed to be operated in underdrainage and was unable to adjust.The patient underwent a revision procedure on (b)(6) 2022.The complaint device was returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.No patient complications were reported as a result of the revision procedure.Age: (b)(6).Height: unknown.Weight: (b)(6).Gender: female.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Investigations: visual inspection: significant deposits in the ped.Control reservoir.Permeability test: the permeability test has shown that the progav 2.0 with ped.Control reservoir is not permeable.To verify which oft he components led tot he blockage the product was separated and the components were tested individually.The investigation has shown, that the progav 2.0 is not permeable, the ped.Control reservoir is permeable.Adjustment test: the progav 2.0 was tested and is not adjustable throughout the normal range.Klick force and brake function test: the brake functionality test has shown that the brake function is operational, however the braking force cannot be measured due to the non-adjustability of the valve.Internal inspection: after dismantling of the valve, significantly deposits were found in progav 2.0.Result: based on our investigation, we confirm the presence of occlusion and non-adjustability in the valve at the time of our investigation.This is likely due to the deposits observed inside the valves.As described in scientific literature, the problem encountered is one of the known, inevitable risks of hc-therapy by shunt implants.We can exclude a defect at the time of release.The valve met all specifications of the final inspection when released from christoph miethke gmbh & co.Kg.No further regulatory actions are required from our point of view.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PROGAV 2.0 W. PED. CONTROL RES.
Common Device Name
HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM  14469
Manufacturer (Section G)
CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM   14469
Manufacturer Contact
joerg knebel
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM   14469
MDR Report Key13487522
Report Number3004721439-2022-00011
Device Sequence Number19909743
Product Code JXG
UDI-Device Identifier04041906502249
UDI-Public4041906502249
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryGM
PMA/510(K) Number
K161853
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2019
Device Explanted Year2022
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 02/08/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/12/2024
Device Model NumberFX670T
Device Catalogue NumberFX670T
Device Lot Number20043278
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/13/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 01/13/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date02/08/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/13/2019
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age40 MO
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight17 KG
-
-