| Model Number |
72404268 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Collapse (1099); Mechanical Problem (1384); Difficult or Delayed Activation (2577); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
03/01/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that this inflatable penile prosthesis (ipp) exhibited activation issues which were noted approximately two months after implant at a follow-up appointment.Our records indicate that no revision surgery or surgical evaluation has been performed to date.No patient complications were reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Event date: exact event date unknown, activation issues were present during the first follow-up visit, two months after implantation.Investigation summary: based on the information available, the cause that contributed to the reported device issues cannot be established as the product is not available for analysis.Device history record (dhr): a dhr and ship history review cannot be performed as the lot number was not available.Device technical analysis: the device is not available for analysis; therefore, no physical or visual analysis of the product could be performed.The reported device performance allegation cannot be confirmed.Labeling review: a review of the ipp instructions for use was completed and did not reveal any evidence of device misuse, off label use, or failure to follow instructions.Investigation conclusion: based on the information available, a conclusion code of cause not established was assigned to this investigation.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Event date: exact event date unknown, activation issues were present during the first follow-up visit, two months after implantation.Investigation summary: based on the information available, the cause that contributed to the reported device issues cannot be established as the product is not available for analysis.Device history record (dhr): a dhr and ship history review cannot be performed as the lot number was not available.Device technical analysis: the device is not available for analysis; therefore, no physical or visual analysis of the product could be performed.The reported device performance allegation cannot be confirmed.Labeling review: a review of the ipp instructions for use was completed and did not reveal any evidence of device misuse, off label use, or failure to follow instructions.Investigation conclusion: based on the information available, a conclusion code of cause not established was assigned to this investigation.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that this inflatable penile prosthesis (ipp) exhibited activation issues which were noted approximately two months after implant at a follow-up appointment.Our records indicate that no revision surgery or surgical evaluation has been performed to date.No patient complications were reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
B3 event date: exact event date unknown, activation issues were present during the first follow-up visit, two months after implantation.Investigation summary: based on the information available, the cause that contributed to the reported device issues cannot be established as the product is not available for analysis.Device history record (dhr): a dhr and ship history review cannot be performed as the lot number was not available.Device technical analysis: the device is not available for analysis; therefore, no physical or visual analysis of the product could be performed.The reported device performance allegation cannot be confirmed.Labeling review: a review of the ipp instructions for use was completed and did not reveal any evidence of device misuse, off label use, or failure to follow instructions.Investigation conclusion: based on the information available, a conclusion code of cause not established was assigned to this investigation.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a patient implanted with this inflatable penile prosthesis (ipp) has experienced device performance issues, related to activation, since the first follow-up appointment.The patient subsequently underwent a replacement procedure during which it was noted that the pump bulb remained flat when pushed.Therefore, the entire ipp was removed and replaced.There were no patient complications reported.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a patient implanted with this inflatable penile prosthesis (ipp) has experienced device performance since the first follow-up appointment, related to activation issues.The patient subsequently underwent a replacement procedure, during which, it was noted that the pump bulb remained flat when pushed.Therefore, the entire ipp was removed and replaced.There were no patient complications reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
B3 event date: exact event date unknown, activation issues were present during the first follow-up visit, two months after implantation.Investigation summary: laboratory analysis confirmed the reported clinical observation of pump issues.The observed pump activation anomaly was determined to be the most probable cause of the reported events.Device history record (dhr) review: the dhr confirmed that the device met all material, assembly, and performance specifications.Technical analysis: upon receipt at our post market quality assurance laboratory, this ipp was thoroughly analyzed.The cylinders were visually inspected, microscopically examined, leak and pressure tested; all tests were passed.The pump was visually inspected, microscopically examined, leak and functionally tested.The pump did not pass the activation testing and its tubing was noted to be worn, which did not likely impact component performance.Product analysis confirmed the reported allegations, as the observed pump anomaly is likely to have affected the functionality of the device.Labeling review: there is no objective evidence that the user did not properly handle or use the device according to the ipp instructions for use.Investigation conclusion: an overall evaluation conclusion code of cause traced to component failure was assigned to this investigation.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|