• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP. SINGLE USE ELECTROSURGICAL KNIFE KD-655; UNIT, ELECTROSURGICAL, ENDOSCOPIC (WITH OR WITHOUT ACCESSORIES)

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP. SINGLE USE ELECTROSURGICAL KNIFE KD-655; UNIT, ELECTROSURGICAL, ENDOSCOPIC (WITH OR WITHOUT ACCESSORIES) Back to Search Results
Model Number KD-655U
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Aspiration/Inhalation (1725); Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888); Pain (1994); Stenosis of the esophagus (4487)
Event Date 11/10/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The suspect device has not been returned to olympus for evaluation and the investigation is in process.For more information, the literature article can be found at: doi: 10.1002/deo2.81.Once the investigation has been completed, a supplemental report will be submitted with device evaluation results.
 
Event Description
Olympus reviewed the following literature: single operator experience of endoscopic submucosal dissection for barrett's neoplasia in a north american academic center by douglas motomura robert bechara.Abstract: objectives: endoscopic submucosal dissection (esd) is carving out an increasing role in the treatment of barrett's associated neoplasia.Esd provides the advantage of en-bloc resections and greater ro resection rates.We aim to present outcomes from one of the largest single-center cohorts of esophageal esd in north america.Methods: all patients undergoing esophageal esd for barrett's neoplasia between oct 2016 and june 2020 at a canadian tertiary care center were included.Demographic, procedural data, and lesion characteristics are presented.Subgroup analysis was performed on patients who underwent extensive resection (>75% of esophageal circumference) and the patients who developed strictures.Results: thirty-four patients were included in the series.The median lesion diameter was 5.7 cm and the median procedure time was 129 min.The enbloc resection rate was 97%, and the ro resection rate was 91%.Curative resection was achieved in 82% of patients.Upstaging in histology occurred in 59% of cases.Two adverse events occurred, and there were no perforations.Procedural outcomes were similar in patients with extensive resections, but those with >75% circumferential resection developed more strictures (65% vs.6.3%, p < 0.01).Stricture formation was associated with extensive resection (odds ratio [or]: 27.5, p < 0.01) and longer lesion diameter (or: 1.7, p = 0.02).Conclusion: our experience with esd for barrett's related neoplasia shows excellent en-bloc and ro resection rate, and provides more accurate histological specimens.Curative resection is possible in the majority of cases, including those with extensive resections.Further investigation into stricture prophylaxis will be useful as near circumferential resections are attempted.The following adverse events were reported involving dualknife kd-650 or dualknife j kd-655: n = 1: one case was aborted due to encountering multiple varices.N = 1: aspiration - one patient had an aspiration event on extubation in the operating room care and required re-intubation.N = 1: delayed bleeding - the second patient developed bleeding after discharge and returned on post-procedure day 4.Conservative management was sufficient, and no-repeat endoscopy or blood transfusions were required.N = 12: stricture formation in patients who had extensive resections; dilations at follow up endoscopies; a median of three balloon dilations were required in patients who developed strictures.Unknown number of patients: admitted for post-operative pain control.The authors did not specify which patients involved which olympus device.There are two reports involved with this literature as follows: (b)(6) dualknife kd-650, (b)(6) dualknife j kd-655.This is report 2 of 2 for - (b)(6) dualknife j kd-655.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being supplemented to provide additional information based on the legal manufacturer's final investigation.The device history record was unable to be reviewed for this device since the lot number was not provided.However, olympus only releases products to market that meet all manufacturing specifications and final product release criteria.Based on the results of the investigation, the relationship between the device and the adverse event cannot be confirmed.There was no complaint reported on the subject device.There is no evidence of an olympus device malfunction.Olympus will continue to monitor field performance for this device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SINGLE USE ELECTROSURGICAL KNIFE KD-655
Type of Device
UNIT, ELECTROSURGICAL, ENDOSCOPIC (WITH OR WITHOUT ACCESSORIES)
Manufacturer (Section D)
OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP.
2951 ishikawa-cho
hachioji-shi, tokyo-to 192-8 507
JA  192-8507
Manufacturer Contact
kazutaka matsumoto
2951 ishikawa-cho
hachioji-shi, tokyo-to 192-8-507
JA   192-8507
426425177
MDR Report Key13516243
MDR Text Key285825524
Report Number8010047-2022-02832
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KNS
UDI-Device Identifier04953170377532
UDI-Public04953170377532
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCA
PMA/PMN Number
K171158
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Literature,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 07/06/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/11/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberKD-655U
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN (LITERATURE)
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received06/10/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention; Other;
-
-