• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER GMBH 6.5MM CENTER SCREW - 36M M; PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER GMBH 6.5MM CENTER SCREW - 36M M; PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED Back to Search Results
Model Number 5573-6536
Medical Device Problem Codes Break (1069); Fracture (1260)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Failure of Implant (1924)
Date of Event 01/18/2022
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Upon completion of the investigation, additional information will be provided in a supplemental report.
 
Event or Problem Description
"it was reported that the patient's right shoulder was revised due to a broken peripheral and center screw in the baseplate.All devices except for the stem were revised.The cup was revised in order to access the glenosphere and because the surgeon wanted to implant thicker implants.".
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The reported event could be confirmed, since the screw is broken as complained.The device inspection revealed the following: the visual inspection has shown that the screw is broken apart, the fragment with a length of about 4.5 mm was not returned for evaluation.The screw head with the locking thread is intact, the are no signs for an excessive contact between the screw head and the baseplate.More than half of the fracture face is not visible anymore, the shiny surface indicates that the fracture faces did rub against each other for a longer period of time.The rest of the fracture face has the typical view of a fatigue fracture with an uniform fine-grained texture.The complaint was forwarded to the r&d department for evaluation with following result: the baseplate was most likely implanted using an improper technique.It appears that some of the screw holes may have been damaged by being drilled off-axis, distorting the circular geometry of the locking rib and therefore not allowing the screws to become fully locked into the baseplate rib.Evidence can be seen in the images of both the baseplate and the underside of the glenosphere.When properly installed in the baseplate, the screws will not migrate from their locked positions.There are other circumstances that may cause this scenario such as using power to drive the screws all the way down, improper use of the drill guide, etc." the relevant dimensions of the screw were verified during the investigation and no deviation from the specification could be detected.A review of the device history for the reported lot did not indicate any abnormalities.No corrective actions are required at this time.A review of the labeling did not indicate any abnormalities.No indications of material, manufacturing or design related problems were found during the investigation.Based on investigation, the root cause was attributed to a user related issue.The failure was most likely caused by an improper implantation of the baseplate, this did lead to a damage of the locking holes and therefore the locking threads of the screws could not be locked in the baseplate as required.Due to that the fixation of the screws was unstable and the force was not distributed as designed which finally caused a fatigue failure of the screws.If more information is provided, the case will be reassessed.
 
Event or Problem Description
"it was reported that the patient's right shoulder was revised due to a broken peripheral and center screw in the baseplate.All devices except for the stem were revised.The cup was revised in order to access the glenosphere and because the surgeon wanted to implant thicker implants.".
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
6.5MM CENTER SCREW - 36M M
Common Device Name
PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER GMBH
bohnackerweg 1
postfach
selzach 2545
SZ  2545
Manufacturer (Section G)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH
325 corporate drive
mahwah NJ 07430
Manufacturer Contact
anna jusinski
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key13518623
Report Number0008031020-2022-00049
Device Sequence Number4158651
Product Code KWS
UDI-Device Identifier07613327098846
UDI-Public07613327098846
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StatePA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K130895
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2018
Device Explanted Year2022
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 06/03/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date02/28/2023
Device Model Number5573-6536
Device Catalogue Number5573-6536
Device Lot NumberX178YT
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/10/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Initial
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 01/18/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer05/04/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date02/11/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date06/03/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/13/2018
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention; Hospitalization;
Patient Age68 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-