| Model Number |
TMT4B10 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction (1907); Inflammation (1932); Pain (1994); Swelling/ Edema (4577)
|
| Date of Event |
01/21/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Zimmer biomet complaint (b)(4).Initial reporter¿s first name is not provided / unknown.Additional 510(k) numbers are k113753 and k112160.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the patient experienced an allergic reaction with the implant at tooth site #20 and it was removed.Patient presented stating she is swollen and in pain.Symptoms as a result of the event: edema, inflammation, pain.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
No additional or corrected information to report.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted to report additional information.The following sections are being reported: h2: if follow-up, what type.H3: device evaluated by manufacturer.H6: type of investigation.H6: investigation findings.H6: investigation conclusions.H10: additional narratives/data.The product was returned for investigation.Based on the evaluation, the device malfunction has not occurred.Additionally, there is no existing nonconformance/capa/hhe/d/ie/product holds against the reported devices that could cause or contribute to the reported event.Zimmer biomet quality management system (qms) has controls in place to ensure the distribution of conforming product.Therefore, based on the available information, the products were likely within specifications and likely conforming when they left zimmer biomet.Dhr review was completed for the subject lot number.It was confirmed that all operations and inspections were executed as per applicable procedure.No deviations or non-conformances, which could have caused or contributed to the reported event was noted as part of the dhr.Lot was inspected and passed all acceptance criteria by qa.Sterilization record was reviewed and verified to have passed all sterilization activities with no issues or nonconformities identified.Complaint history review was performed for the reported lot number for similar event and no other complaint was identified.The reported event could not be recreated due to the nature of the dental device and event.A definitive root cause could not be identified.No further investigation and no immediate capa/hhe/d escalation is required, as the complaint investigation did not confirm the product was nonconforming at the time of distribution, and no new failure mode, harm, or hazardous situation was identified through the investigation performed.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|