• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643 BARD FLAT MESH; SURGICAL MESH

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643 BARD FLAT MESH; SURGICAL MESH Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 0112640
Medical Device Problem Codes Defective Device (2588); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Adhesion(s) (1695); Hernia (2240); Insufficient Information (4580)
Date of Event 09/24/2020
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.This emdr represents the bard mesh (bard flat mesh) (device #1).An additional emdr was submitted to represent the bard/davol ventralight st mesh (device #2).Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of unspecified bard mesh (bard flat mesh) on (b)(6) 2014 and bard/davol ventralight st mesh on (b)(6) 2020.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against both the devices.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: h11: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided and to correct implant date.Root cause is inconclusive, no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-may-2014) is considered to be a best estimate.This supplemental emdr represents the bard flat mesh (device 1).An additional supplemental emdr was submitted to represent the bard/davol ventralight st mesh (device 2).Updated fields: a2, b3, b4, b5, b7, d.4, d.6b (date of explant), g3, g6, h2, h4, h6, h10, h11.Corrected field: d.6a (date of implant).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event or Problem Description
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of unspecified bard mesh (bard flat mesh) on (b)(6) 2014 and bard/davol ventralight st mesh on (b)(6) 2020.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against both the devices.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2014 - patient was diagnosed with recurrent umbilical hernia thereby underwent open repair with the implant of bard flat mesh (device 1).Per op notes, "an umbilical incision was made, a bard flat mesh (device 1) was placed into the defect using prolene sutures." (b)(6) 2020 - patient was diagnosed with recurrent ventral hernia thereby underwent robotic-assisted repair with the removal of mesh (device 1) and implant of ventralight st (device 2).Per op notes, "the small bowel that was adherent to the mesh and the mesh was excised.A ventralight st (device 2) was placed into the peritoneal cavity using sutures.".
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BARD FLAT MESH
Common Device Name
SURGICAL MESH
Manufacturer (Section D)
DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643
100 crossings blvd.
warwick RI 02886
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD SHANNON LIMITED 3005636544
san geronimo industrial park
lot #1, road #3, km 79.7
humacao PR 00791
Manufacturer Contact
andrew topoulos
100 crossings blvd.
warwick, RI 02886
4018258495
MDR Report Key13522869
Report Number1213643-2022-90749
Device Sequence Number17195377
Product Code FTL
UDI-Device Identifier00801741016493
UDI-Public(01)00801741016493(17)190628(10)HUYE1659
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateTX
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
PREAMENDMENT
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2014
Device Explanted Year2020
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Consumer
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 10/23/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/28/2019
Device Catalogue Number0112640
Device Lot NumberHUYE1659
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Type of Report(Section G)Initial
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 02/03/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer10/03/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date02/14/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date10/23/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured05/15/2014
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age63 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-