| Model Number |
RA002-5555SL70 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Fluid/Blood Leak (1250); Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Device has not been returned for evaluation; however device return is anticipated.No conclusions can be drawn at this time.If any additional information is provided, a supplemental report will be submitted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Information was received that the end cap was loose on the rod and liquid had escaped.No patient adverse event was reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
A supplemental report will be submitted upon completion of device evaluation.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that while removing the rod after it had achieved lengthening goals, it was noted the rod had loose components and liquid had escaped.No patient adverse impact was reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional data: b5, d9, g3, g6, h2, h3, h6, h10.During visual inspection, score marks were observed on the rod, consistent with expected markings due to incremental distraction.Inspection of the returned rod revealed the distraction rod was functionally able to be lengthened by hand, which would indicate a broken locking pin.The reported failure mode is therefore confirmed, as distraction rod loose was able to be lengthened by hand.Because the locking pin is broken, there is nothing constraining the axial motion of the distraction rod within the housing tube.The pistoning action of the distraction rod due to a broken locking pin would allow for fluid ingress into the actuator.Liquid extrusion was also confirmed as the rod pistoned.In addition, sectioning the rod confirmed the broken locking pin.The patient's unique anatomy and/or daily activities are possible causes of the reported failure.The iqc inspection data for the lot of locking pin was reviewed, and the parts met design specifications per the engineering drawings.As part of the investigation, the work order was reviewed, and confirmed the device passed all inspections per the acceptance tests prior to shipment.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
No additional information was provided.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|