• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CONCORD MANUFACTURING 2008T HEMODIALYSIS SYSTEM W/BIBAG; DIALYZER, HIGH PERMEABILITY WITH OR WITHOUT SEALED DIALYSATE SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CONCORD MANUFACTURING 2008T HEMODIALYSIS SYSTEM W/BIBAG; DIALYZER, HIGH PERMEABILITY WITH OR WITHOUT SEALED DIALYSATE SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number 190766
Device Problems Melted (1385); Smoking (1585)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 02/07/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The plant investigation is in process.A supplemental mdr will be submitted upon completion of this activity.
 
Event Description
A biomedical technician (biomed) at a user facility reported that a fresenius 2008t hemodialysis (hd) machine had a melted valve 103.The valve 103 was very hot and the melting dripped down onto the bibag hydraulic assembly and cable.A burning smell and significant smoke was noticed during setup for patient treatment.The smoke caused the detectors to go off and the fire department arrived at the user facility.The machine was taken outside to cool off and air out before being brought back into the user facility and quarantined.A patient was not connected to the machine at the time of the incident and there was no harm to any patients or individuals because of this malfunction.The machine has approximately 26,652 hours and the valve 103 was the original fresenius part on the machine.The biomed did not observe any spark, flame, arcing, or any other visible heat or electrical damage related to the melting found on the valve.The biomed confirmed that the machine has not had any past problems with failing the electrical leakage test and is always plugged into a hospital grade ground-fault circuit interrupter (gfci) outlet.The biomed ordered replacement valve 103, bibag hydraulic assembly, and cable but not all parts have arrived to resolve the issue.Therefore, the unit has not been returned to service.The original parts are available to be returned to the manufacturer for physical evaluation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: d9, h3 plant investigation: although it was stated that the complaint device was available to be returned, to date no parts were returned to the manufacturer for physical evaluation.Additionally, no on-site evaluation was performed by a fresenius field service technician (fst).A records review was performed on the reported serial number.An investigation of the device manufacturing records was conducted by the manufacturer.There were no non-conformances, or any associated rework identified during the manufacturing process which could be related to the reported event.In addition, the device history record (dhr) review confirmed the results of the in-progress and final quality control (qc) testing met all requirements.The investigation into the cause of the reported problem was not able to be confirmed.A definitive conclusion regarding the complaint incident cannot be reached without a physical examination of the complaint device.
 
Event Description
A biomedical technician (biomed) at a user facility reported that a fresenius 2008t hemodialysis (hd) machine had a melted valve 103.The valve 103 was very hot and the melting dripped down onto the bibag hydraulic assembly and cable.A burning smell and significant smoke was noticed during setup for patient treatment.The smoke caused the detectors to go off and the fire department arrived at the user facility.The machine was taken outside to cool off and air out before being brought back into the user facility and quarantined.A patient was not connected to the machine at the time of the incident and there was no harm to any patients or individuals because of this malfunction.The machine has approximately 26,652 hours and the valve 103 was the original fresenius part on the machine.The biomed did not observe any spark, flame, arcing, or any other visible heat or electrical damage related to the melting found on the valve.The biomed confirmed that the machine has not had any past problems with failing the electrical leakage test and is always plugged into a hospital grade ground-fault circuit interrupter (gfci) outlet.The biomed ordered replacement valve 103, bibag hydraulic assembly, and cable but not all parts have arrived to resolve the issue.Therefore, the unit has not been returned to service.The original parts are available to be returned to the manufacturer for physical evaluation.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
2008T HEMODIALYSIS SYSTEM W/BIBAG
Type of Device
DIALYZER, HIGH PERMEABILITY WITH OR WITHOUT SEALED DIALYSATE SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
CONCORD MANUFACTURING
director, quality systems
4040 nelson avenue
concord CA 94520
Manufacturer (Section G)
CONCORD MANUFACTURING
director, quality systems
4040 nelson avenue
concord CA 94520
Manufacturer Contact
jason busch
920 winter st
waltham, MA 02451
9043166958
MDR Report Key13529311
MDR Text Key285600151
Report Number2937457-2022-00245
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KDI
UDI-Device Identifier00840861100910
UDI-Public00840861100910
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K121341
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Biomedical Engineer
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/04/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number190766
Device Catalogue Number190766
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Device AgeMO
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/07/2022
Initial Date FDA Received02/14/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received03/02/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/04/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured12/04/2015
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-