• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number ZA9003
Medical Device Problem Codes Break (1069); Mechanical Jam (2983)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 01/11/2022
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
If implanted, give date: not applicable, there is no indication that the lens was implanted.If explanted, give date: not applicable, there is no indication that the lens was implanted.Hence, not explanted.The intraocular lens (iol) has not returned for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that when inserting an intraocular lens (iol) in a patient's right eye, the cartridge tip only had contact when they noticed the haptic was bent.It was indicated that the lens was stuck in the cartridge.The doctor removed and completed the procedure with another johnson & johnson lens with the same model and diopter.There were no surgical and/or medical interventions required.The patient was reported to be doing ok post operation and no patient injury was reported.No further information was provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: section d9: device available for evaluation? yes section d9: returned to manufacturer: yes section d9: date returned to manufacturer: mar 10, 2022 section h3: device evaluated by manufacturer: yes device evaluation: the complaint lens was received stuck in the complaint emerald cartridge.The lens was removed and visual inspection revealed a damaged and detached haptic, and lens damage.No further issues identified.The complaint issues "haptic damaged and stuck in cartridge" were confirmed; however, based on the complaint investigation results the complaint issue could not be confirmed to be related to the manufacturing or design process.Therefore, there is no indication of a product deficiency or product malfunction.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS IOL
Common Device Name
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key13539849
Report Number3012236936-2022-00432
Device Sequence Number3684709
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier05050474528994
UDI-Public(01)05050474528994(17)261023
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateMD
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P990080
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 05/12/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberZA9003
Device Catalogue NumberZA90030190
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 01/21/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer05/06/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date02/16/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date05/12/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/23/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Concomitant Medical Products
and Therapy/Usage Dates
EMERALD CARTRIDGE, LOT: UNKNOWN
Patient SexFemale
Patient RaceWhite
-
-