• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK INC GUNTHER TULIP JUGULAR & FEMORAL VENA CAVA FILTER SET; DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK INC GUNTHER TULIP JUGULAR & FEMORAL VENA CAVA FILTER SET; DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR Back to Search Results
Model Number G21360
Medical Device Problem Codes Obstruction of Flow (2423); Structural Problem (2506)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Internal Organ Perforation (1987); Perforation of Vessels (2135); Anxiety (2328); Thrombosis/Thrombus (4440)
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
The following information is alleged: the patient received a gunther tulip inferior vena cava (ivc) filter on (b)(6) 2012, and the filter subsequently perforated the patient's inferior vena cava.One prong of the filter is further perforating the patient's aorta.Hospital and medical records have been requested, but not yet provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Initial reporter occupation: non-healthcare professional.Investigation the reported allegations have been further investigated based on the information provided to date.The following allegations have been investigated: vena cava/ aorta perforation.Filter interacts with ivc wall, e.G.Penetration/perforation/embedment.This may be either symptomatic or asymptomatic.Potential causes may include improper deployment; and (or) excessive force or manipulations near an in-situ filter (e.G., a surgical or endovascular procedure in the vicinity of a filter).Potential adverse events that may occur include, but are not limited to, the following: trauma to adjacent structures, vascular trauma, vena cava perforation, vena cava penetration.Catalog number and lot number are unknown.The alleged tulip is manufactured and inspected according to specifications.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up medwatch report will be submitted if additional relevant information becomes available.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
G4: 510(k) - k072240.Additional information: investigation: investigation is reopened due to additional information provided.The reported allegations have been further investigated based on the information provided to date.The following allegations have been investigated: organ/aorta/vena cava (vc) perforation, deep vein thrombosis (dvt), anxiety, worry, fear, physical limitations.Filter interacts with ivc wall, e.G.Penetration/perforation/embedment.This may be either symptomatic or asymptomatic.Potential causes may include improper deployment; and (or) excessive force or manipulations near an in-situ filter (e.G., a surgical or endovascular procedure in the vicinity of a filter).Potential adverse events that may occur include, but are not limited to, the following: trauma to adjacent structures, vascular trauma, vena cava perforation, vena cava penetration.Ivc occlusion/ thrombosis, new dvt, ivc stenosis as a reported complication, is a known risk in relation to filter implant and is well documented in the clinical literature and in clinical practice guidelines.This is supported by the clinical evidence report established to assess available clinical data to identify and evaluate the clinical safety and performance of the cook vena cava filters.Potential adverse events that may occur include, but are not limited to, the following: vena cava occlusion or thrombosis, vena cava stenosis, deep vein thrombosis.Unknown if the reported anxiety, worry, fear, and physical limitations are directly related to the filter and unable to identify a corresponding failure mode at this point in time.20 devices in lot.The product is manufactured and inspected according to specifications.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up medwatch report will be submitted if additional relevant information becomes available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, or that any cook device caused or contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Event or Problem Description
Patient allegedly received an implant on (b)(6) 2012 due to deep vein thrombosis (dvt) and pulmonary embolism (pe).Patient is alleging vena cava and organ perforation.The patient further alleges "multiple prongs of the ivc filter implanted in my body have perforated my ivc.Further, one prong of the filter is perforating my abdominal aorta," as well as anxiety, worry, post-implant dvt, fear, and physical limitations.Report from ct (computed tomography): "ivc filter is present: location: at the renal veins strut caval penetration: present at 12 o'clock and 3 o'clock.Strut organ penetration: present involving the abdominal aorta.Strut fracture: absent.".
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
GUNTHER TULIP JUGULAR & FEMORAL VENA CAVA FILTER SET
Common Device Name
DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer (Section G)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer Contact
larry pool
750 daniels way
bloomington, IN 47404
8123392235
MDR Report Key13546522
Report Number1820334-2022-00241
Device Sequence Number20089688
Product Code DTK
UDI-Device Identifier10827002213606
UDI-Public(01)10827002213606(17)140301(10)3266660
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateOH
Initial Reporter CountryUS
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2012
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Consumer
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 05/16/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/01/2014
Device Model NumberG21360
Device Catalogue NumberIGTCFS-65-UNI
Device Lot Number3266660
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Initial
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 01/26/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer04/25/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date02/16/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date05/16/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured03/01/2012
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Life Threatening;
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight86 KG
-
-