|
The actual device has been returned and is currently pending evaluation.Once reliability engineering evaluates the device, a supplemental medwatch report will be sent accordingly.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: investigation summary: the complaint device has not been returned, therefore unavailable for a physical evaluation.However, a photo was provided.Upon visual inspection of the photo, it appeared that the device had wear marks near the handle and jaws.Also, the jaw was broken.This complaint can be confirmed.Given that no lot number was provided, a manufacturing record evaluation (mre) review cannot be performed.If the lot number becomes available, the mre review will be performed.The photo do not provide enough evidence to determine root cause.Hands on analysis should provide the evidence necessary to confirm the root cause.This type of failure has been attributed to wear and tear as well as rough use, since the repeated excess force applied when a large amount of tissue is being grasped which cause a potential to break; also, the age of the device causing damage in the device.Other than this possibility, cannot be discerned at this point.Per ifu, recommends to visually inspect the instrument and check for damage and wear; verify that all cutting edges are free of nicks and have a continuous edge; verify that moveable parts have smooth movement without excessive play; inspect those locking mechanisms fasten securely and close easily; and verify that long, thin instruments are free of bending and distortion.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.H10 correction narrative: d9: date device returned to manufacturer: it was incorrectly reported on the initial report that the device was returned for evaluation.Therefore, this field has been updated accordingly to reflect the correct information.
|