| Model Number |
398493 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Failure to Interrogate (1332); Premature Elective Replacement Indicator (1483)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
08/17/2021
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
We received your event description for the above mentioned device.As of today, the medical device is not available for analysis, therefore the device itself could not be investigated.The analysis is thus based on the inspection of the quality documents associated with the manufacture of this particular device as well as the data returned for evaluation.The manufacturing process for this device was re-investigated.All production steps had been performed accordingly.There was no sign of any inconsistency during the manufacturing process.Particularly the final acceptance test proved the device functions to be as specified.The returned data were inspected.Based on the information available for analysis, a damage of an electrical component cannot be excluded.An analysis of the device itself would be required for further information regarding the root cause.Please note that, as the biomonitor 2-af cannot deliver therapies, a potential damage of the device does not represent any risk for the patient.However, we recommend to replace the device and to return it for analysis to biotronik.Of course, the patients individual circumstances and medical judgment determine the ultimate decision about patient care.Our recommendation is purely based on a technical assessment.Should the device itself become available, this investigation will be updated.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Device explanted due to eri and failure to interrogate.No adverse patient events reported.Should additional information become available, it will be added to this file.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The device was received for analysis.Prior to the analysis of the device, the quality documents accompanying the manufacturing process for this device were re-investigated and all production steps were performed accordingly.In particular, the final acceptance test proved the device functions to be as specified.The device could not be interrogated with a programmer, thus confirming the clinical observation.Therefore, the device was opened and subjected to further investigation.The visual inspection of the inner assembly showed no anomalies.The measurement of the battery voltage confirmed a depleted battery.In a next step, the battery was disconnected from the electronic module.Further thorough investigation of the electronic module did not show any anomalies.In particular the current consumption proved to be normal and expected.The battery was sent to the manufacturer for further analysis.The manufacturing records of the battery were inspected, documenting that the battery parameters were within specification during the manufacturing.The battery was subjected to a visual and an electrical inspection as well as a microcalorimetry analysis.The visual inspection of the battery did not reveal any external signs of damage.The measurement of the battery voltage confirmed a depleted battery and the microcalorimetry analysis showed a normal heat dissipation.In a next step, the battery was opened for destructive analysis.The inspection of the inner assembly identified internal short circuit, which led to an elevated internal self-depletion within the battery and therefore contributed to the clinical observation.In conclusion, an elevated internal self-depletion within the battery was found to be the root cause for the clinical observation.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|