• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK INC UNIVERSA SOFT URETERAL STENT SET; FAD STENT, URETERAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK INC UNIVERSA SOFT URETERAL STENT SET; FAD STENT, URETERAL Back to Search Results
Model Number G49933
Medical Device Problem Code Break (1069)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 02/09/2022
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Name and address: phone: (b)(6).This report includes information known at this time.A follow up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.
 
Event or Problem Description
As reported, during a retrograde intrarenal surgery a universa soft ureteral stent was used.They physician wanted to insert the device into the patient's ureteral.When the or nurse opened the device package they noticed that one side of the pigtail loop was ruptured.The physician used another new same type device to complete the procedure without difficulty.No unintended section of the device remained inside of the patient's body.No additional procedures were required due to the occurrence.No adverse effects were reported due to the occurrence.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Name and address: phone: (b)(6).This report includes information known at this time.A follow up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.
 
Event or Problem Description
As reported, during a retrograde intrarenal surgery a universa soft ureteral stent was used.They physician wanted to insert the device into the patient's ureteral.When the or nurse opened the device package they noticed that one side of the pigtail loop was ruptured.The physician used another new same type device to complete the procedure without difficulty.No unintended section of the device remained inside of the patient's body.No additional procedures were required due to the occurrence.No adverse effects were reported due to the occurrence.
 
Event or Problem Description
No additional information regarding the patient and/or event has been received since the previous medwatch report was sent.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unavailable, or unchanged.Event summary as reported, during a retrograde intrarenal surgery a universa soft ureteral stent was used.They physician wanted to insert the device into the patient's ureteral.When the or nurse opened the device package they noticed that one side of the pigtail loop was ruptured.The physician used another new same type device to complete the procedure without difficulty.No unintended section of the device remained inside of the patient's body.No additional procedures were required due to the occurrence.No adverse effects were reported due to the occurrence.Investigation - evaluation reviews of the complaint history, device history record, instructions for use, specifications, and quality control procedures and a visual inspection of the device were conducted during the investigation.The device was returned for investigation.The coil on the stent¿s tethered end was observed to be separated.The separated end was still threaded on the tether.A document-based investigation evaluation was performed.No related non-conformances were recorded, and there have been no other reported complaints for this lot number.The device history record review provides objective evidence that the device was manufactured to specification.There is no evidence of nonconforming devices from the complaint lot in house or in the field.A review of relevant manufacturing documents was conducted.There is no indication that a design or process related failure mode contributed to the reported event.Sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.The device is provided with instructions for use which state, ¿upon removal from package, inspect the product to ensure no damage has occurred.¿ based on the available information, cook has concluded that a cause for the stent separation could not be determined.Cook will continue monitoring of similar complaints and has notified the appropriate personnel of this event.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNIVERSA SOFT URETERAL STENT SET
Common Device Name
FAD STENT, URETERAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer (Section G)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer Contact
jason crouch
750 daniels way
bloomington, IN 47404
8123392235
MDR Report Key13560099
Report Number1820334-2022-00257
Device Sequence Number4313115
Product Code FAD
UDI-Device Identifier00827002499331
UDI-Public(01)00827002499331(17)240908(10)14199444
Combination Product (Y/N)N
PMA/510(K) Number
K151051
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 05/09/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/08/2024
Device Model NumberG49933
Device Catalogue NumberUSH-524
Device Lot Number14199444
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Initial
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 02/09/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer04/18/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date02/18/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date05/09/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/08/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexFemale
-
-