| Model Number |
3125-1200S |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Break (1069); Fracture (1260)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Failure of Implant (1924); Nonunion/Delayed-union Bone Fracture (2369); Ambulation or Postural Difficulties (2544); Implant Pain (4561)
|
| Date of Event |
01/28/2021
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Device is not accessible.If additional information becomes available, it will be provided in a supplemental report.Device still implanted in the patient.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The husband of a patient reported the following: "i am referring to the previous correspondence ((b)(4)) which in summary stated that after an operation, on my wife's left femur, she had begun to suffer from atopic dermatitis.Intervention on (b)(6) 2019 performed at the (b)(6) hospital.Subsequently, the fact that from the metal tests done to my wife, she was not allergic to titanium or the material of the nail, from a certain point of view calmed me, but then after a year ((b)(6) 2021) the nail broke.From asst (b)(6) hospital report i read: "x-ray: unconsolidated existence of pertrochanteric fracture with reverse rim and fatigue fracture of the femoral nail at the level of the cephalic screw." the patient also reported pain.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Device is not accessible.If additional information becomes available, it will be provided in a supplemental report.Device still implanted in the patient.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The husband of a patient reported the following: "i am referring to the previous correspondence ((b)(4)) which in summary stated that after an operation, on my wife's left femur, she had begun to suffer from atopic dermatitis.Intervention on (b)(6) 2019 performed at the (b)(6) hospital.Subsequently, the fact that from the metal tests done to my wife, she was not allergic to titanium or the material of the nail, from a certain point of view calmed me, but then after a year ((b)(6) 2021) the nail broke.From asst (b)(6) hospital report i read: "x-ray: unconsolidated existence of pertrochanteric fracture with reverse rim and fatigue fracture of the femoral nail at the level of the cephalic screw." the patient also reported pain.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Correction: please refer to h6 health impact code.The reported event could not be confirmed since the device was not returned for evaluation and no other evidences were provided.More detailed information about the complaint event, like x-rays, as well as the affected device must be available in order to determine the exact root cause of the complaint event.The provided information mentions a unconsolidated existence of pertrochanteric fracture with reverse rim and fatigue fracture of the femoral nail.In this relation and to answer the questions from the event description following statements from the attached instructions for use can be pointed out: "the use of these devices provides the surgeon with a means of bone fixation for the management of fracture and reconstructive surgery.These devices are intended only to assist healing and are not intended to replace normal bone structures.No fracture fixation device that is subject to material fatigue can be expected to withstand activity levels in the same way as would a normal healthy bone.The fracture fixation system, therefore, will not be as strong, reliable or durable as a normal human bone.The implant is intended for temporary bone fixation.In the event of a delay in bone consolidation, or if such consolidation does not take place, or if explantation is not carried out, complications may occur, for example fracture or loosening of the implant or instability of the implant system.Regular postoperative examinations (e.G.X-ray checks) are advisable." related to the other questions regarding drawing of the device and occurrence rate of breakages it can be stated that this data is only for internal use and is in general not forwarded to patients.We can assure that stryker has an effective post market surveillance system in place and does monitor complaints to ensure that our devices in the market are safe and effective.A review of the device history for the reported lot did not indicate any abnormalities.No corrective actions are required at this time.A review of the labeling did not indicate any abnormalities.No indications of material, manufacturing or design related problems were found during the investigation.If the device is returned or if any additional information is provided, the investigation will be reassessed.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The husband of a patient reported the following: "i am referring to the previous correspondence (b)(6) which in summary stated that after an operation, on my wife's left femur, she had begun to suffer from atopic dermatitis.Intervention on (b)(6) 2019 performed at the (b)(6) hospital.Subsequently, the fact that from the metal tests done to my wife, she was not allergic to titanium or the material of the nail, from a certain point of view calmed me, but then after a year on (b)(6) 2021) the nail broke.From (b)(6) hospital report i read: "x-ray: unconsolidated existence of pertrochanteric fracture with reverse rim and fatigue fracture of the femoral nail at the level of the cephalic screw." the patient also reported pain.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|