|
|
| Catalog Number |
5955610 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Defective Device (2588); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Adhesion(s) (1695); Pain (1994); Hernia (2240); Obstruction/Occlusion (2422); Insufficient Information (4580)
|
| Date of Event |
10/06/2020
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient"; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol ventralight st on (b)(6) 2015.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the ventralight st.Attorney alleges general allegations for ¿past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient." it is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient"; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: h11: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided and to correct pma/510(k) and brand name.Root cause is inconclusive; no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-jul-2014) is considered to be a best estimate.Updated fields: a2, b2, b3, b4, b5, b7, d3, d4 (catalog no, lot no, udi, expiry date) g3, g6, h2, h4, h6, h10, h11 corrected fields: d1 (brand name), g4 (pma/510(k).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text: not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol ventralight st on (b)(6) 2015.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the ventralight st.Attorney alleges general allegations for ¿past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient." it is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2015 ¿ patient was diagnosed with incisional hernia thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with implant of ventralight st using echo.Per operative notes, ¿the defect was measured and a ventralight st using echo was placed and tacked.¿ (b)(6) 2020 ¿ patient was diagnosed with small bowel obstruction secondary to incarcerated incisional hernia thereby underwent open repair.Per operative notes, ¿the hernia sac was dissected.Small bowel was taken down, and on one area, it was densely adhered to the edge of the fascia which was transected.A synthetic mesh was placed and sutured.¿ (note: there is no mention/visualization of ventralight st using echo in this procedure).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|