|
Catalog Number EC500F |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problem
Pulmonary Embolism (1498)
|
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed with special attention to the raw materials, subassemblies, manufacturing process, and quality control testing.This lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: the device was not returned.Medical records were provided.Approximately, one year of post deployment, the patient presented to the emergency department (ed) with complaints of chest pain.A computed tomography (ct) scan of the chest demonstrated multiple bilateral pulmonary emboli, with most of the emboli stable or slightly smaller in size.The segments of involvement were the same as seen on previous examination from six months prior and at the time of filter deployment.Therefore, no definite evidence for acute embolus was seen.There were no device deficiencies identified within the medical records.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for pulmonary embolism as no objective evidence has been provided to confirm any alleged deficiency.Based on the available information definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documents (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, and unit label) showed that the product labeling is adequate.(expiry date: 07/2014).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported through the litigation process that a vena cava filter was placed in a patient after being diagnosed with deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism.The device has not been removed and there were no reported attempts made to retrieve the filter.The patient was diagnosed with pulmonary embolism post filter implant; however, the current status of the patient is unknown.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed with special attention to the raw materials, subassemblies, manufacturing process, and quality control testing.This lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: the device was not returned.Medical records were provided.Approximately, one year of post deployment, the patient presented to the emergency department (ed) with complaints of chest pain.A computed tomography (ct) scan of the chest demonstrated multiple bilateral pulmonary emboli, with most of the emboli stable or slightly smaller in size.The segments of involvement were the same as seen on previous examination from six months prior and at the time of filter deployment.Therefore, no definite evidence for acute embolus was seen.There were no device deficiencies identified within the medical records.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for pulmonary embolism as no objective evidence has been provided to confirm any alleged deficiency.Based on the available information definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documents (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, and unit label) showed that the product labeling is adequate.(expiry date: 07/2014).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported through the litigation process that a vena cava filter was placed in a patient after being diagnosed with deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism.The device has not been removed and there were no reported attempts made to retrieve the filter.The patient was diagnosed with pulmonary embolism post filter implant; however, the current status of the patient is unknown.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|