| Model Number |
AVSM10100 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Ischemia (1942); Pain (1994); Restenosis (4576)
|
| Date of Event |
01/25/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
As the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records will be performed.The sample was not returned to the manufacturer for inspection/evaluation.Therefore, the investigation of the reported event is inconclusive.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause for this event is unknown.The instructions for use (ifu) is adequate for the reported device/patient code(s) and provides general instructions for use, as well as warnings, precautions and potential complications associated with the device.Upon receipt of new or additional information, a follow-up report will be submitted as applicable.(expiry date: 11/2022).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported through the results of a clinical trial, that approximately seven months post index procedure, restenosis in target lesion was observed and standard pta was used to successfully treat the target lesion.The current status of the subject is not provided.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported through the results of a clinical trial, that approximately seven months post index procedure, restenosis in target lesion was observed and standard pta was used to successfully treat the target lesion.The current status of the subject is not provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Manufacturing review: the lot history records of this lot were reviewed with special attention to the manufacturing and inspection of this product and the product was found to have met the specification prior to shipment.Investigation summary: the sample was not returned for evaluation and image was not provided.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported issue.A definitive root cause could not be determined based upon the available information.Labeling review: in reviewing the relevant labeling for this product the potential issue was found addressed.Under potential complications the instruction for use state 'new lesions in the access circuit requiring reintervention, thrombotic occlusion, restenosis of the target lesion requiring reintervention, pseudoaneurysm.In regards to pta the instruction for use state: 'pre-dilate the stenosis with a pta balloon catheter of appropriate length and diameter for the lesion to be treated'.And 'post dilate the covered stent with an angioplasty balloon sized appropriately as to ensure complete wall apposition to the reference vessel.Avoid balloon dilation in the healthy, non-stenosed segment of the vein'.Holding and handling of system was found described, in particular the instruction for use state: 'do not touch the distal catheter assembly (i.E.The dark brown catheter segment) during covered stent deployment since this may interfere with covered stent deployment and may lead to misplacement'.Section a through f: the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: manufacturing review: the lot history records of this lot were reviewed with special attention to the manufacturing and inspection of this product and the product was found to have met the specification prior to shipment.Investigation summary: the sample was not returned for evaluation and image was not provided.There were no reported issues with the delivery system; the stent was successfully placed.Pre- and post-dilation were performed upon index procedure.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported issue.A definitive root cause could not be determined based upon the available information.Labeling review: in reviewing the relevant labeling for this product the potential issue was found addressed.Under potential complications the instructions for use state 'new lesions in the access circuit requiring reintervention, thrombotic occlusion, restenosis of the target lesion requiring reintervention, pseudoaneurysm, (¿)'.In regards to pta the instructions for use state: 'pre-dilate the stenosis with a pta balloon catheter of appropriate length and diameter for the lesion to be treated'.And 'post dilate the covered stent with an angioplasty balloon sized appropriately as to ensure complete wall apposition to the reference vessel.Avoid balloon dilation in the healthy, non-stenosed segment of the vein'.Holding and handling of system was found described, in particular the instructions for use state: 'do not touch the distal catheter assembly (i.E.The dark brown catheter segment) during covered stent deployment since this may interfere with covered stent deployment and may lead to misplacement'.H10: (expiry date: 11/2022).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text: device not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported through the results of a clinical trial, that approximately seven months post index procedure, restenosis in target lesion was observed and standard pta was used to successfully treat the target lesion.It was further reported that approximately one year and nine months post index procedure, restenosis in target lesion was observed and the subject experienced pain.Av access circuit re-intervention was performed for pain and standard pta was successfully used for treatment.The current status of the subject is not provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: manufacturing review: the lot history records of this lot were reviewed with special attention to the manufacturing and inspection of this product and the product was found to have met the specification prior to shipment.Investigation summary: the sample was not returned for evaluation and image was not provided.There were no reported issues with the delivery system; the stent was successfully placed.Pre- and post-dilation were performed upon index procedure.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported issue.A definitive root cause could not be determined based upon the available information.Labeling review: in reviewing the relevant labeling for this product the potential issue was found addressed.Under potential complications the instructions for use state 'new lesions in the access circuit requiring reintervention, thrombotic occlusion, restenosis of the target lesion requiring reintervention, pseudoaneurysm, (¿)'.In regards to pta the instructions for use state: 'pre-dilate the stenosis with a pta balloon catheter of appropriate length and diameter for the lesion to be treated'.And 'post dilate the covered stent with an angioplasty balloon sized appropriately as to ensure complete wall apposition to the reference vessel.Avoid balloon dilation in the healthy, non-stenosed segment of the vein'.Holding and handling of system was found described, in particular the instructions for use state: 'do not touch the distal catheter assembly (i.E.The dark brown catheter segment) during covered stent deployment since this may interfere with covered stent deployment and may lead to misplacement'.(expiry date: 11/2022), g3, h6 (patient).The information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported through the results of a clinical trial, that approximately seven months post vascular covered straight stent placement in the cephalic vein arch via the left upper arm access, restenosis in target lesion had allegedly occurred which required additional arteriovenous access circuit re-intervention.Reportedly, standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty was performed for treatment, and the treatment re-intervention was successful, and new access was not created.It was further reported that approximately one year and nine months post the vascular covered straight stent placement, restenosis in target lesion had allegedly occurred and the subject experienced pain which required additional arteriovenous access circuit re-intervention.Reportedly, standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty was performed for treatment, and the treatment re-intervention was successful, and new access was not created.Furthermore, approximately two years and two months post the covered straight stent placement, the subject had an adverse event of steal syndrome which resulted in an arteriovenous access circuit re-intervention.Reportedly, standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and bare metal stent placement were performed for treatment and the treatment re-intervention was successful and the outcome of the adverse event was resolved.In addition, two years, ten months and twenty-two days post the covered straight stent placement, restenosis in target lesion had allegedly occurred which required additional arteriovenous access circuit re-intervention.Reportedly, standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty was performed for treatment, and the treatment re-intervention was successful, and new access was not created.The current status of the patient was unknown.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|