• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC IRELAND ENDURANT II ILIAC STENT GRAFT; SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC IRELAND ENDURANT II ILIAC STENT GRAFT; SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TR Back to Search Results
Model Number ETLW1624C156E
Medical Device Problem Code Leak/Splash (1354)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Insufficient Information (4580)
Date of Event 01/26/2022
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event or Problem Description
An endurant ii stent graft was implanted in a patient for the endovascular treatment of an 30mm iliac aortic aneurysm.It was reported approximately 8 years post the index procedure follow up ct identified a type ib endoleak with aneurysm growth in the internal iliac.Intervention was completed with coiling of the hypogastric artery and the limb was extended into the internal artery and the endoleak was resolved.Per physician the cause of the type ib endoleak was anatomy related where the aneurysm grew. no additional clinical sequelae were reported and the patient is fine.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis conclusion: the reported type ib endoleak of the right limb was confirmed on the films provided; however the type ia n endoleak could not be confirmed.Lack of pre-implant ct¿s did not allow for a thorough assessment of the pre-implant anatomy.Angiograms (including endoleak interrogation) could allow for a more comprehensive determinations of the endoleak source/cause.It most likely that the proximal endoleak was a type ia, but this could not be fully confirmed from the limited films available.Disease progression, as noted per the physician, with aneurysm morphology changes over the time of implant of the devices may have been a factor in the occurrence of the reported events.It is also possible that the aneurysmal right common iliac artery was being pressurized via the marginal distal seal.B5; additional information received : it was reported that a type ia endoleak was also identified on the bifurcate graft on the same day of the intervention.Endoanchors were implanted at rao of 35 and lao on both sides of graft and the endoleak resolved.The physician believes that the graft was properly sized during the initial procedure during initial procedure and the cause of the type ia endoleak was due to progression of aneurysmal disease.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ENDURANT II ILIAC STENT GRAFT
Common Device Name
SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TR
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC IRELAND
parkmore business park west
galway
EI 
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC IRELAND
parkmore business park west
galway
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
alison sweeney
parkmore business park west
galway 
EI  
091708096
MDR Report Key13577039
Report Number9612164-2022-00723
Device Sequence Number4368453
Product Code MIH
UDI-Device Identifier00613994991706
UDI-Public00613994991706
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateNY
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P100021
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2014
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 03/24/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/07/2015
Device Model NumberETLW1624C156E
Device Catalogue NumberETLW1624C156E
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/15/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 02/14/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer03/02/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date02/22/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date03/24/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/07/2013
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age71 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-