|
Olympus reviewed the following literature article: "transparent cap-assisted endoscopic sclerotherapy in esophageal varices: a randomized-controlled trial" by lili maa, xiaoquan huangb, jingjing lian, et al.This randomized prospective, single-center study was aimed to determine the feasibility, efficacy, and cost of performing endoscopic injection sclerosis (eis) with and without a transparent cap attached to the tip of the gastroscope.A total of 120 consecutive patients with esophageal varices with or without gastric varices were enrolled and randomized into two groups, a control (n=61) and a transparent cap-assisted (n= 59) group.The primary and secondary outcome measures were to determine whether the use of a transparent cap could reduce the use of salvage hemostasis methods while injection hemorrhage comparing to the endoscopic injection without a cap and to identify the hemorrhagic events that occurred during injection.Moreover, it also aimed to determine the convenience and the cost-effectiveness of using transparent cap-assisted endoscopy and the possibility of using this technique in clinical practice.The study reported a reduction of average injection sites in the transparent cap-assisted group compared with the control group (1.2 ± 0.4 vs.1.4 ± 0.05, p=0.000).No differences were observed for the hemorrhage that occurred during injection, and the rebleeding rate was statistically insignificant.In conclusion, transparent cap-assisted endoscopic sclerotherapy provided a clear field of vision by fixing the targeted veins.It also proved to reduce the salvage hemostasis method when bleeding occurs during sclerotherapy injection.And additionally, it is also associated with reduced numbers of injection sites and reduced cost of endoscopic therapy.The authors used two olympus devices, nm-200l-0423 and gif-h260.The authors did not specify which device was used in relation to the adverse events and therefore both will be reported.The adverse events reported were:
thirty-six patients experienced hemorrhage during the injection in the transparent cap-assisted group and only in two patients balloon tamponade was used, six patients received additional injection sclerotherapy, and one patient received both balloon tamponade and sclerotherapy injection.In the control group, 31 patients had hemorrhage during injection, balloon tamponade was used in 12 patients, and five patients received additional injection sclerotherapy.The rebleeding rate 89.8% in transparent group and 93.4% in non-transparent group.This article includes two reports for the reported adverse events:
patient identifier (b)(6): nm-200l-0423
patient identifier (b)(6): gif-h260
this is report 1 of 2 for patient identifier (b)(6): nm-200l-0423.
|