|
Additional narrative: the subject device has been received, the investigation is in progress, no conclusion could be drawn at the time of filing this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Device report from synthes reports an event in (b)(6) as follows: it was reported that on (b)(6) 2022, the handle of the viper 2 advanced rod holder broke after rod mis insertion at the retrieval time.There was no surgical delay.There were no fragments generated.The procedure was completed successfully.This report involves one (1) viper 2 system rod holder, advanced.This is report 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.H3, h6 investigation summary: the product was returned to depuy synthes for evaluation.The depuy synthes team conducted a visual inspection of the returned device.Visual analysis of the returned sample revealed that the viper2 rod holder, advanced was broken.The handle (component 2929-90-005) was broken inside the silicone overmold.The upper locking bolt (component 887002517) was missing from the returned device.No other damage or defects were noted.A dimensional inspection was unable to be performed due to the inaccessibility of the complaint relevant parts.The observed condition of the device was consistent with a random component failure that may have been caused by exposure to unintended forces.As part of depuy synthes quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.The overall complaint was confirmed as the observed condition of the viper2 rod holder, advanced would contribute to the complained device issue.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the complaint condition and hence the root cause cannot be determined.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Drawing/specifications reviewed: no issues.H4 device history: a review of the receiving inspection (ri) for rod holder adv (inc.Rod bolt) was conducted identifying that lot number mi45054 was released in a single batch.Batch1: lot (b)(4) were released on 20oct2015 with no discrepancies.As a result, the ri identified no issues during the manufacturing and release of this device that could have contributed to the problem reported by the customer.The ri identified no issues during the manufacturing and release of this device that could have contributed to the problem reported by the customer.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|