|
Attorney alleges that the patient was implanted with a bard/davol composix e/x (product).Is alleged that on (b)(6) 2006, the patient was implanted with the product in the course of an incisional ventral hernia repair surgery.It is alleged that further to the patient's implantation with the product, the patient suffered the development of chronic pain, inflammation, swelling, bowel obstruction, gastrointestinal malfunction, and hernia recurrence, necessitating further reparative surgery on (b)(6) 2008.Is alleged that subsequent to the latter surgery, the plaintiff has continued to suffer from chronic pain, inflammation, swelling, bowel obstruction, gastrointestinal malfunction, and hernia recurrence.It is alleged that subsequent to the latter surgery, the patient has continued to suffer from chronic pain, inflammation, swelling, bowel obstruction, gastrointestinal malfunction, and hernia recurrence.Attorney alleges that the patient suffered injuries, losses, and damages resulting from numerous defects in the product that create an unreasonably high risk of injury with severe permanent adverse health consequences.It is also alleged that the patient experienced severe pain and suffering, including chronic pain.Attorney alleges that the patient has been treated with a course of hospitalization, diagnostic imaging, revision surgery, serum testing, antibiotics, analgesics, and rest.It is alleged that the patient will require further invasive repair surgery, physiotherapy, rehabilitation, and will continue to require other medical care in the foreseeable future.It is also alleged that the device was defective.
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient including permanent injury, hernia recurrence, bowel obstruction, pain and subsequent surgical intervention.The instructions-for-use (ifu) supplied with the device lists hernia recurrence and inflammation as possible complications.A review of the manufacturing records was performed and found that the lot was manufactured to specification.Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.
|