• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COVIDIEN MFG DC BOULDER VALLEYLAB; ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCES

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COVIDIEN MFG DC BOULDER VALLEYLAB; ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCES Back to Search Results
Model Number E7510-25
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Superficial (First Degree) Burn (2685)
Date of Event 02/07/2022
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
According to the reporter, during a toe amputation procedure, the pad read green rem on the forcetriad and a burn resulted on the canine patient.The patient was the first surgery of the day and was placed in right lateral recumbency on a towel which was on top of a heated water blanket.The left lateral abdomen was clipped and the valley lab rem polyhesive infant patient return electrode, 6-30lb was place on the shaved abdomen area.The pad had previously been used but the date is uncertain.No redux gel was used on this patient.When the pad was applied, the white paper was removed and the technician stated it was sticky and adhered to the patient well and the rem turned green.No tape or vetwrap was applied, just the pad.As in the image, there may have been evidence of redux gel used previously but could not be confirmed.The settings on the unit were 25 cut, 30 v, 35 coag.The procedure was started and the cautery pen used for nearly the whole surgery without incident until the doctor heard a sizzle sound.The pen device was inspected and wire to the unit with no obvious abnormalities.The patient was undraped and the pad was examined from the top but not removed to look under the pad.No evidence as the picture shows of abnormality.The procedure was completed and the cautery pen still worke d well.Upon removal of the pad, the patient had a small nickel sized first degree burn at the center of the pad.The image shows a light brown area in the center, however, the doctor stated at the time it was black. they have used this unit since 2017 without incident.They have never used any other type of pad with the unit.The patient undergone wound care management for burn treatment.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation summary: medtronic conducted an investigation based upon all information received.The device was not returned, but a photo was available for evaluation.Visual inspection noted device sample and shown use.No photos of burn.Unable to determine cause.It was reported that use of the device resulted in a burn.The reported issue could not be confirmed.The most likely cause could not be established from the information available.The manufacturing records for each device are thoroughly reviewed prior to release to ensure that it meets all medtronic quality specifications.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: d9, g3, h3, h6 h3 evaluation summary: medtronic conducted an investigation based upon all information received.The device and a photo were available for evaluation.The evaluation found no potentially contributing factors, and the sample met all related specifications.It was reported that use of the device resulted in a burn.The reported issue could not be confirmed.The most likely cause could not be identified because no related problem was detected with the device.The manufacturing records for each device are thoroughly reviewed prior to release to ensure that it meets all medtronic quality specifications.A secondary review of the device history records found no potentially contributing factors.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Correction: e1(first name, last name, phone number), e4(email), g3.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VALLEYLAB
Common Device Name
ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCES
Manufacturer (Section D)
COVIDIEN MFG DC BOULDER
5920 longbow dr
boulder CO 80301 3299
Manufacturer (Section G)
COVIDIEN MFG DC BOULDER
5920 longbow dr
boulder CO 80301 3299
Manufacturer Contact
tracy landers
5920 longbow drive
boulder, CO 80301
3035816943
MDR Report Key13589367
Report Number1717344-2022-00214
Device Sequence Number17173353
Product Code GEI
UDI-Device Identifier10884524001043
UDI-Public10884524001043
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateTN
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K822572
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 04/06/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/05/2021
Device Model NumberE7510-25
Device Catalogue NumberE7510-25
Device Lot Number91510050X
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 02/07/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer03/01/2022
03/31/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date02/24/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date03/17/2022
04/06/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/06/2019
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age3 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight17 KG
-
-