• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: C.R. BARD, INC. (COVINGTON) -1018233 UROFORCE® BALLOON DILATION CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

C.R. BARD, INC. (COVINGTON) -1018233 UROFORCE® BALLOON DILATION CATHETER Back to Search Results
Model Number 887604
Medical Device Problem Codes Partial Blockage (1065); Inflation Problem (1310)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 10/21/2021
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation is still in progress.Once the investigation is complete a supplemental report will be filed.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the dilation catheter balloon was malfunctioning.Per additional information received via email on 01-feb-2022, it was reported that the dilation catheter balloon would not inflate.Customer stated that no medical concerns related to the reported issue.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The reported event was confirmed however the cause was unknown.One sample was confirmed to exhibit the reported failure.2 dilation catheters were returned opened without original packaging.Catheters were marked 1 and 2 during evaluation to differentiate.Using a eagle inflation device both catheter balloons were attempted to be inflated with di water.Catheter 1 would not allow any water to be injected into the catheter.Catheter 2 inflated without issue.The inflation lumen of catheter 1 appeared to be blocked as no water would pass through.As the cause of the blockage is unknown, the reported event will be confirmed cause unknown.Catheter does not meet specification as it was unable to inflate.The sample was observed under microscope.No blockage was noted.Destructive testing was performed and the inflation valve was cut off.Water flowed freely through the inflation valve when the catheter shaft was cut off.No kink was noted in the catheter shaft.Inflation difficulty caused by a blockage of the catheter shaft.Sample was cut longitudinally.A clear substance was found in a portion of the catheter shaft.The substance is the cause of the blockage.The complaint is confirmed for the reported event of difficult to inflate, the root cause is a foreign substance in the inflation lumen.The product was used for treatment purposes.A potential root cause for this failure could be "inadequate material selection".The device history record was reviewed and found nothing that could have caused or contributed to the reported event.The instructions for use were found adequate and state the following: "catheter balloon inflation: 1.Confirm proper placement of the balloon within the urinary tract.2.Inflate the balloon with standard inflation medium (e.G., diatrizoate meglumine injection u.S.P.60% diluted as appropriate) using a 10cc or larger syringe or inflation device.Note: do not use air or any gaseous substance as a balloon inflation medium.Note: the use of an inflation device to monitor balloon pressure is strongly recommended to determine that adequate pressure is applied and that maximum limits of the balloon are not exceeded.Caution: if loss of pressure in the balloon occurs or the balloon ruptures, immediately stop the procedure, deflate the balloon and remove carefully.Do not attempt to reinflate the balloon.If, upon inspection of the balloon, it is noted that pieces of the balloon are missing, check for and endoscopically retrieve the fragments when possible." h11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : the actual/suspected device was inspected.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the dilation catheter balloon was malfunctioning.Per additional information received via email on 01-feb-2022, it was reported that the dilation catheter balloon would not inflate.Customer stated that no medical concerns related to the reported issue.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UROFORCE® BALLOON DILATION CATHETER
Common Device Name
BALLOON DILATION CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
C.R. BARD, INC. (COVINGTON) -1018233
8195 industrial blvd
covington 30014
Manufacturer (Section G)
C.R. BARD, INC. (COVINGTON) -1018233
8195 industrial blvd
covington 30014
Manufacturer Contact
juan velez
8195 industrial blvd
covington 30014
7707846100
MDR Report Key13596354
Report Number1018233-2022-00869
Device Sequence Number1989337
Product Code EZN
UDI-Device Identifier10801741053006
UDI-Public(01)10801741053006
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateOH
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K993840
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 06/20/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/01/2022
Device Model Number887604
Device Catalogue Number887604
Device Lot NumberGFEN1281
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/09/2021
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Initial
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 02/01/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer06/21/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date02/24/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date06/21/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/28/2020
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Other;
Patient SexUnknown
-
-