• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DEPUY MITEK LLC US GRYPHON T BR DS ANCH W/OC; SOFT-TISSUE ANCHOR, BIOABSORBABLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DEPUY MITEK LLC US GRYPHON T BR DS ANCH W/OC; SOFT-TISSUE ANCHOR, BIOABSORBABLE Back to Search Results
Model Number 210811
Medical Device Problem Code Break (1069)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 02/09/2022
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
It was reported by the customer in (b)(6) that during an arthroscopic hip repair of glenoid lip procedure on (b)(6) 2022, it was observed that the anchor on the gryphon t br ds anch w/oc device broke.All the broken parts were removed.Another like device was used to complete the procedure.There were no adverse patient consequences nor surgical delay reported.No additional information was provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional narrative: udi: (b)(4).To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Investigation summary the complaint device has not been returned, therefore unavailable for a physical evaluation.However, photo was provided.Upon visual inspection of the photo, it was observed only the device without the handle cover and the suture was not in place.Finally, it was not possible to see the condition of the anchor.Manufacturing record evaluation is not required as the reported event is not associated with the manufacturing process and/or the potential cause of the defect cannot be associated to manufacturing.Based on the visual inspection of the photo, this complaint cannot be confirmed.The photo do not provide enough evidence to determine root cause.Hands on analysis should provide the evidence necessary to confirm the root cause.The possible root cause of anchor breakage can be associated with off axis insertion and levering during insertion.Moreover, excessive force on the inserter could have resulted damage the anchor.However, it cannot be conclusively affirmed.As per ifu, insert the healix peek anchor into the hole created by the awl while maintaining the same axial alignment and rotate the healix peek inserter handle in a clockwise direction until the etched depth marking on the handle shaft is flush with the bone.Inserting the awl less than the specified depth, axial misalignment or levering with the anchor upon insertion, may result in anchor fracture.Also, it is important to do not apply a bending force to the inserter, this can damage the anchor or inserter tip.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, in depuy synthes mitek, additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post market surveillance.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: investigation summary : the product was returned to mitek for evaluation.Mitek then conducted visual inspection of device received.Upon visual inspection, the anchor was cracked but not broken off and was still in the suture.No anomalies found in the suture.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number: 5l80159 and no nonconformances were identified.Based on the visual inspection, this complaint cannot be confirmed.The possible root cause for the damage in the anchor can be associated with off axis insertion and levering during insertion.Moreover, excessive force on the inserter could have resulted damage the anchor.However, it cannot be conclusively affirmed.As per ifu, insert the healix peek anchor into the hole created by the awl while maintaining the same axial alignment and rotate the healix peek inserter handle in a clockwise direction until the etched depth marking on the handle shaft is flush with the bone.Inserting the awl less than the specified depth, axial misalignment or levering with the anchor upon insertion, may result in anchor fracture.Also, it is important to do not apply a bending force to the inserter, this can damage the anchor or inserter tip.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, in depuy synthes mitek, additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post market surveillance.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.The actual device has been returned and is currently pending evaluation.Once the device has been evaluated, a supplemental medwatch report will be sent accordingly.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
GRYPHON T BR DS ANCH W/OC
Common Device Name
SOFT-TISSUE ANCHOR, BIOABSORBABLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
DEPUY MITEK LLC US
325 paramount drive
raynham MA 02767
Manufacturer Contact
kara ditty-bovard
chemin-blanc 38
le locle, MA CH-24-00
SZ   CH-2400
6013142063
MDR Report Key13623861
Report Number1221934-2022-00643
Device Sequence Number20133569
Product Code MAI
UDI-Device Identifier10886705001255
UDI-Public10886705001255
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryCH
PMA/510(K) Number
K150209
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date07/31/2022
Device Model Number210811
Device Catalogue Number210811
Device Lot Number5L80159
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/09/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 02/09/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer02/09/2022
03/14/2022
03/29/2022
04/01/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date02/28/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date03/04/2022
03/15/2022
03/30/2022
04/04/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/19/2019
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-