|
A lead extraction procedure commenced to remove a right ventricular (rv) lead to upgrade a dual chamber pacemaker to a crtd system.The patient was a congenital heart patient and did not have normal anatomy.A venogram showed venous occlusion and an unidentifiable (congenital) large vertical venous structure from the access point (subclavian) at the pocket, moving inferior.There was also a remnant of a previously extracted lead (date and model unknown) in the subclavian vein.Spectranetics lead locking devices (llds) were inserted into the ra and rv leads to provide traction.First, the physician attempted to remove the rv lead using a spectranetics 14f glidelight laser sheath and a spectranetics medium visisheath dilator sheath.With these devices, advancement was made to the superior vena cava (svc) region, but the rv lead was found to be adhered to the ra lead, and both leads pulled back and bunched up together in the right atrium and svc regions.The glidelight device could no longer be advanced.A wire was advanced through the glidelight device to obtain access for re-implantation of new leads.The ra lead was snared from the groin and attempt was made again to remove the ra removed with the 14f glidelight and medium visisheath devices, but the 14f glidelight could not pass the lead on lead binding site.There was much difficulty every time the 14f glidelight device passed the remnant lead present in the subclavian, as there was a lot of resistance.The physician then attempted to remove the rv lead, upsizing to a 16f glidelight and a large visisheath device.Tension was placed on the ra lead from the groin and significant resistance was encountered with the large visisheath in the subclavian area.The physician removed the devices from the patient, with the plan to proceed without the visisheath, but the patient started bleeding from the pocket site (subclavian vein) (mdr #).The bleeding could not be controlled, and the patient's blood pressure dropped.A figure of 8 intervention was attempted by the physician but was unsuccessful due to the amount of blood.The surgeon was paged and was in the room within approximately 5 minutes.Transesophageal echocardiography (tee) showed no effusion and an x-ray showed no blood around the lungs.Rescue interventions were implemented.The surgeons had a difficult time accessing the bleeding site (subclavian vein) as it was under the patient¿s clavicle but was eventually able to control the bleeding by suturing above the bleeding site.They were unsure if this was a sufficient repair, so the surgeons stayed scrubbed in while the physician re-implanted a new ra and rv lead.The surgeons advised to implant as quickly as possible so an lv lead was not attempted.The physician chose to abandon both the rv lead (mdr #1721279-2022-00035) and the ra lead (mdr #1721279-2022-00036), cutting and capping both leads/llds which remained in the patient.The physician did not attempt to unlock either lld prior to cutting and capping.The patient was stable by the end of the procedure.This report captures the large visisheath, the outermost device in the region when the subclavian bleeding (perforation) occurred, requiring intervention.There was no alleged malfunction of any spectranetics devices in use during the procedure.
|