• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CORDIS CORPORATION TRAPEASE PVCF FEM/JUG 55CM CSI; FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CORDIS CORPORATION TRAPEASE PVCF FEM/JUG 55CM CSI; FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR Back to Search Results
Model Number 466P306AU
Device Problem Unintended Movement (3026)
Patient Problem Unspecified Tissue Injury (4559)
Event Date 09/01/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Occupation: other, senior counsel, litigation.Please note that the exact event date is unknown and the event date is the complaint awareness date.It was reported that a patient underwent placement of a trapease vena cava filter.The information provided indicated that the filter subsequently malfunctioned and caused filter tilt.The indication for the filter placement, procedural details and medical history have not been provided and there is no additional information available for review.The product was not returned for analysis and the sterile lot number has not been provided; therefore, no device analysis nor device history record review could be performed.The trapease vena cava filter is indicated for use in the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via percutaneous placement in the vena cava for patients in which anticoagulants are contraindicated, anticoagulant therapy for thromboembolic disease has failed, emergency treatment following massive pulmonary embolism where anticipated benefits of conventional therapy are reduced or for chronic, recurrent pulmonary embolism where anticoagulant therapy has failed, or is contraindicated.The purpose of a vena cava filter is to catch thrombus from the lower extremities as it travels along normal blood flow patterns up towards the heart.Ivc filter tilt has been associated with practitioner technique and/or vessel anatomy, specifically asymmetry and tortuosity.Without imaging available for review the event could not be confirmed nor a cause attributed.Given the limited information available for review at this time, there is nothing to suggest that the reported events are related to the design and manufacturing process of the device; therefore, no corrective action will be taken.Should additional information become available, the file will be updated accordingly.Please note that this is the initial report for this product.
 
Event Description
As reported by the legal brief, the patient underwent placement of a trapease vena cava filter.The report states that the filter subsequently malfunctioned and caused injury and damage to the patient including, but not limited to filter tilt.As a direct and proximate result of these malfunctions, the patient suffered life-threatening injuries and damages, and required extensive medical care and treatment.As a further proximate result, the patient has suffered and will continue to suffer significant medical expenses, pain and suffering, and other damages.
 
Event Description
Additional information received per the medical records indicate that the patient has a history of deep vein thrombosis (dvt) and was undergoing anticoagulation treatment.The patient had a drop in his hemoglobin with spontaneous bleeding.A preoperative duplex sonogram showed no evidence of dvt in the iliofemoral system and persistent dvt in the right femoral vein.The filter was deployed below the renal veins bilaterally using road mapping to confirm placement.The patient tolerated the procedure well.Additional information received per the patient profile form (ppf) states that the patient experienced filter tilt.The patient became aware of the reported event approximately sixteen years after the index procedure.The patient continues to experience right leg swelling, lower back pain and anxiety (thinking about it daily) related to the filter.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
It was reported that a patient underwent placement of a trapease vena cava filter.The information provided indicated that the filter subsequently malfunctioned and caused filter tilt.The patient reported becoming aware of the event approximately sixteen years post implant.The patient also reported right leg swelling, lower back pain and anxiety related to the filter.According to the medical record the indication for the filter implant was developing a spontaneous bleed while on anticoagulation for a history of deep vein thrombosis.A preoperative duplex sonogram showed no evidence of dvt in the iliofemoral system and persistent dvt in the right femoral vein.The filter was deployed below the renal veins bilaterally using road mapping to confirm placement.The patient tolerated the procedure well.The product was not returned for analysis and the sterile lot number provided is not a valid lot number; therefore, no device analysis nor device history record review could be performed.The trapease vena cava filter is indicated for use in the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via percutaneous placement in the vena cava for patients in which anticoagulants are contraindicated, anticoagulant therapy for thromboembolic disease has failed, emergency treatment following massive pulmonary embolism where anticipated benefits of conventional therapy are reduced or for chronic, recurrent pulmonary embolism where anticoagulant therapy has failed, or is contraindicated.The purpose of a vena cava filter is to catch thrombus from the lower extremities as it travels along normal blood flow patterns up towards the heart.Ivc filter tilt has been associated with practitioner technique and/or vessel anatomy, specifically asymmetry and tortuosity.Without imaging available for review the event could not be confirmed nor a cause attributed.Pain, leg swelling and anxiety do not represent a device malfunction and may be related to underlying patient specific issues and comorbidities.Given the limited information available for review at this time, there is nothing to suggest that the reported events are related to the design and manufacturing process of the device; therefore, no corrective action will be taken.Should additional information become available, the file will be updated accordingly.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TRAPEASE PVCF FEM/JUG 55CM CSI
Type of Device
FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
CORDIS CORPORATION
14201 nw 60 avenue
miami lakes FL 33014
Manufacturer (Section G)
CORDIS CORPORATION
14201 nw 60 avenue
miami lakes FL 33014
Manufacturer Contact
karla castro
14201 nw 60 avenue
miami lakes, FL 33014
7863138372
MDR Report Key13653513
MDR Text Key291313376
Report Number9616099-2022-05385
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DTK
UDI-Device Identifier20705032009451
UDI-Public20705032009451
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K020316
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/27/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/02/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number466P306AU
Device Catalogue Number466P306AU
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received04/06/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Life Threatening;
Patient Age70 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-