• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG PROGAV 2.0 WITH SA20 U.DISTALEM KATHETER; HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG PROGAV 2.0 WITH SA20 U.DISTALEM KATHETER; HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT Back to Search Results
Model Number FX420T
Medical Device Problem Code Mechanical Problem (1384)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Hydrocephalus (3272)
Date of Event 01/31/2022
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturing site evaluation: investigation on-going.Should relevant additional information / investigation results become available, a supplemental medwatch report will be submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that a progav 2.0 shuntsystem (part # fx420t) was implanted during a procedure performed on (b)(6) 2020.According to the complainant, the shunt system was believed to be blocked and was unable to be adjusted.The patient underwent a revision procedure on (b)(6) 2022.The complaint device was returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.No patient complications were reported as a result of the revision procedure.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation: visual inspection: the following observations were made during the visual inspection: -tissue residues on the shunt system.Permeability test: the test showed that the progav 2.0 shunt system is permeable.Computer control test: the computer controlled test showed the opening pressure of the progav 2.0, at a reference flow rate of 20 ml/h in a horizontal position of the valve, to be 1,51 cmh2o.This is within the specified tolerance of 1 cmh2o ± 3 cmh2o.Additionally, the shuntassistant was tested according to standard procedure in the vertical position of the valve.At a fixed opening pressure of 20 cmh2o in the vertical position, a pressure of 20 cmh2o +4/-2 cmh2o is expected.The results indicated that at a reference flow of 20 ml/h in the vertical position, the shuntassistant had a pressure of 18,92 cmh2o.This is within the specified tolerance of 20 cmh2o +4/-2 cmh2o.Adjustability test: in this step, it was investigated whether the adjustable progav 2.0 can be successfully set to each specified pressure setting.It was checked whether the valve is fully adjustable within the full range of specified pressure settings (in increments of 5 cmh2o).The progav 2.0 was found to be adjustable to all pressure settings.The shuntassistant is a fixed pressure valve, therefore the adjustability test is inapplicable.Braking force and brake function test: the braking force of the progav 2.0 was within the specified tolerance and the brake function operated as expected.Internal inspection of product: in order to verify whether the investigated shunt system was compromised by the known risks of hydrocephalus therapy, e.G.By a build-up of natural substances (protein, blood, or tissue particles) in the cerebrospinal fluid, the valves are finally opened with a special tool.After dismantling of the valves, deposits were found in both valves.Results: we are obliged to inform you that the condition of the product could be affected due to the interval between the explantation date and the release of the product, because fungus and mold can develop.So, the investigation result could be invalid because the time of delay of the start of the investigation.Based on our investigation results, we can determine deposits.The deposits had no affect to the technical properties at the time of the investigation.The cause of the aforementioned functional impairment is not known to us at the time of the examination.Proteins in the cerebrospinal fluid can influence the function temporarily and are known side effects in hydrocephalus therapy.We can exclude a defect at the time of release.The shunt system met all specifications of the final inspection when released from christoph miethke gmbh & co.Kg.From our point of view, no further regulatory actions are required.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PROGAV 2.0 WITH SA20 U.DISTALEM KATHETER
Common Device Name
HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM  14469
Manufacturer (Section G)
CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM   14469
Manufacturer Contact
joerg knebel
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM   14469
MDR Report Key13655965
Report Number3004721439-2022-00037
Device Sequence Number2481183
Product Code JXG
UDI-Device Identifier04041906136628
UDI-Public4041906136628
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryJA
PMA/510(K) Number
K161853
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2020
Device Explanted Year2022
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 06/16/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/20/2025
Device Model NumberFX420T
Device Catalogue NumberFX420T
Device Lot Number20047461
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/16/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 02/03/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer05/18/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date03/02/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date06/16/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/21/2020
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight50 KG
-
-