• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS Back to Search Results
Model Number DIU225
Medical Device Problem Code Unstable (1667)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Visual Impairment (2138)
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Patient weight: unknown/asked but unavailable.Date of event: unknown, asked but exact date is not known.The best estimate date provided as a week or two post (b)(6) 2022 (implant date).The device was not returned for analysis, therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that an intraocular lens (iol) was explanted from patient's left eye due to residual myopia and a toric lens rotation from 110 to 60 degrees.A suture was required, however, there was no patient injury.Another johnson & johnson diu225 lens (same model and lower diopter) was implanted as a replacement iol.The patient's post-operative outcome was not available.No other information was provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: section d9: device available for evaluation? yes section d9: returned to manufacturer on: 2/28/2022 section h3: device evaluated by manufacturer¿ yes device evaluation: the complaint lens was received inside a plastic bag stuck to a piece of gauze.Visual inspection under magnification revealed that the lens was received cut into three pieces, which is consistent with a lens that was handled during explant.No issues related to or could have contributed to visual issues were observed.Based on the return condition of the lens, the complaint issue could not be confirmed, and no product deficiency could be identified.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency and the reported issue could not be confirmed.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS IOL
Common Device Name
LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key13664088
Report Number3012236936-2022-00573
Device Sequence Number1945311
Product Code MJP
UDI-Device Identifier05050474746954
UDI-Public(01)05050474746954(17)241028
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateWA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2022
Device Explanted Year2022
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 04/18/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/28/2024
Device Model NumberDIU225
Device Catalogue NumberDIU225U110
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 02/07/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer04/07/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date03/03/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date04/18/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/28/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient SexFemale
Patient EthnicityNon Hispanic
Patient RaceWhite
-
-