• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. INDIGO SYSTEM SEPARATOR 8; QEW

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. INDIGO SYSTEM SEPARATOR 8; QEW Back to Search Results
Model Number SEP8-B
Medical Device Problem Code Break (1069)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 02/04/2022
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
The patient was undergoing a thrombectomy procedure in the superficial femoral artery (sfa) of the popliteal and the tibio peroneal trunk using an indigo system aspiration catheter 7 (cat7), a lightning aspiration tubing (lightning) and an indigo system separator 8 (sep8).During the procedure, the physician completed multiple passes using the cat7 and sep8.Next, the sep8 bulb was noticed to be sheared off in the patient based on fluoroscopic imaging.Subsequently, the physician attempted to aspirate the sep8; however, the sep8 could not be removed.Therefore, the sep8 was removed via open surgical embolectomy.It was reported that the surgical embolectomy was required regardless of the sep8 bulb breaking off because the entire clot burden could not be aspirated with the cat7.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This device is available for return.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation of the returned sep8 confirmed that the bulb was fractured off the distal tip of the delivery wire.If the sep8 is repeatedly manipulated against resistance in tough clot burden, the device may become fatigued.If the device is continued to be manipulated against resistance after fatigued, it may subsequently fracture.Penumbra separators are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INDIGO SYSTEM SEPARATOR 8
Common Device Name
QEW
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key13672620
Report Number3005168196-2022-00100
Device Sequence Number19998346
Product Code QEW
UDI-Device Identifier00815948022980
UDI-Public00815948022980
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateFL
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K161523
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 05/09/2022
Report Date (Section F) 01/01/2005
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/17/2023
Device Model NumberSEP8-B
Device Catalogue NumberSEP8
Device Lot NumberF102075
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 02/08/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer05/03/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date03/04/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date05/09/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/17/2020
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age22 YR
Patient SexMale
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
-
-