• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. BENCHMARK 6F 071 DELIVERY CATHETER; DQY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. BENCHMARK 6F 071 DELIVERY CATHETER; DQY Back to Search Results
Model Number BMK6F95MBER120
Medical Device Problem Code Break (1069)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 02/04/2022
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
The patient was undergoing a thrombectomy procedure in the basilar artery using a benchmark 6f 071 delivery catheter (benchmark), a penumbra system 3max reperfusion catheter (3maxc), and a non-penumbra catheter.During the procedure, the physician placed the benchmark in the v3 segment of the left vertebral artery using radial access.While the physician attempted to advance the catheter through the benchmark, the physician experienced resistance; and the catheter would not advance through.Therefore, the physician removed the catheter.Subsequently, the physician attempted to advance three other catheters through the benchmark; however, the same issue occurred.Therefore, the three catheters were also removed.Afterwards, while advancing a 3maxc through the benchmark, the physician experienced resistance.However, the physician was able to advance the 3maxc through the benchmark and completed the procedure with one pass using the 3maxc and benchmark.Upon removal of the benchmark and the 3maxc, the physician noticed that the distal end of the benchmark was broken.The procedure ended at this point.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This device is available for return.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation of the returned benchmark revealed the device was kinked on its distal shaft.This kink was likely the reported distal damage.Based on the reported event, the root cause of this damage could not be determined.This damage likely contributed to the reported resistance during advancement of catheters through the benchmark.If the benchmark is manipulated against resistance, damage such as a kink may occur.Penumbra products are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.Note: based on the investigation findings, this is not considered a reportable event.This event did not and, if it were to recur, it would not cause or contribute to a serious injury or death.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BENCHMARK 6F 071 DELIVERY CATHETER
Common Device Name
DQY
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key13674452
Report Number3005168196-2022-00101
Device Sequence Number4893874
Product Code DQY
UDI-Device Identifier00814548014173
UDI-Public00814548014173
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryUK
PMA/510(K) Number
K142321
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 06/01/2022
Report Date (Section F) 01/01/2005
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/15/2024
Device Model NumberBMK6F95MBER120
Device Catalogue NumberBMK6F95MBER120
Device Lot NumberF108404
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 02/04/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer05/24/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date03/04/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date06/01/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/16/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age74 YR
Patient SexMale
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
-
-