| Catalog Number |
0112980 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Defective Device (2588); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Scar Tissue (2060); Hernia (2240); Insufficient Information (4580)
|
| Date of Event |
07/18/2012
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of unspecified bard/davol perfix light plug and perfix plug on (b)(6) 2008 and/or (b)(6) 2012.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the perfix plug.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided a supplemental emdr will be submitted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of unspecified bard/davol perfix light plug and perfix plug on (b)(6) 2008 and/or (b)(6) 2012.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the perfix plug.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2008 ¿ patient was diagnosed with left inguinal direct hernia thereby underwent open repair with implant of perfix plug (device 1).Per operative notes, ¿ at the level of external ring, a large direct hernia was noted and reduced.A large perfix plug (device 1) was placed within the hernia defect and secured with sutures.¿ (b)(6) 2012 - patient was diagnosed with recurrent left inguinal direct hernia thereby underwent open repair with implant of perfix light plug (device 2).Per operative notes, ¿ scar from the previous hernia and recurrent direct type inguinal hernia with weakness was noted.The previously placed mesh (device 1) was felt as a hard structure.The defect was repaired with perfix light plug (device 2) and sutures.¿.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive, no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|