|
(b)(4).A review of the device history record has been completed.No deviations or non-conformances noted.Device evaluation: analysis of the returned device identified: underweight, broken shell and red particles in the shell.A visual and microscopic analysis was performed which identified: sharp broken on posterior assessed as a surgical impact opening, for the non-penetrating nick in the shell and crease fold.A dimension measurement in the shell was performed which identify the thickness within specification.Based on the device analysis the final assessment is: a sharp broken on posterior assessed as a surgical impact opening.Further information from the reporter regarding event, product, or patient details has been requested.No additional information is available at this time.Reason for reoperation: rupture.
|