| Model Number |
RONYX40022UX |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
02/20/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
An attempt was made to use a resolute onyx coronary drug eluting stent to treat a lesion in the saphenous vein graft (svg).It was reported that the stent failed to cross the lesion and stent dislodgement occurred after the device had been removed from the patient.It was stated that the device was removed from the patient and when rinsing the device in a bowl of sterile water on the surgical table, the stent dislodged.The patient is alive with no injury.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information: the lesion had 95% stenosis and severe plaque burden and was located in the saphenous vein graft (svg) to the posterior descending coronary artery (pda).There were no difficulties noted when removing the device from the hoop or when removing the protective sheath.The device was inspected before use with no issues.Negative prep was not performed.The lesion was pre-dilated.The device did not pass through a previously deployed stent.Resistance was noted while advancing the device to the lesion.Excessive force was not used.Both a non-medtronic guide extension catheter and a buddy wire were used during the procedure.Event date 20 february 2022.Patient age, sex and gender provided.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product analysis summary: device returned with stopcock attached to luer and was removed with no issues noted.A kink was evident to the hypotube immediately distal to the strain relief.The stent was not present on the balloon when it returned for analysis.Deformation was evident to the dislodged stent.Stent wrap was kinked and stent struts were raised.Crimp impressions were visible on the exposed balloon surface.The balloon folds remained intact.Deformation was evident to the distal tip.The inner lumen could not be verified with a 0.015 inch mandrel most likely due to hardened blood in the guidewire lumen.No other damage evident to the remainder of the device.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|