• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP. SINGLE USE ELECTROSURGICAL KNIFE KD-650

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP. SINGLE USE ELECTROSURGICAL KNIFE KD-650 Back to Search Results
Model Number KD-650L
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Perforation (2001); Aspiration Pneumonitis (4455)
Event Date 11/14/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device referenced in this report has not been returned to olympus for evaluation.The investigation is ongoing.The definitive cause of the user¿s experience cannot be determined at this time.This report will be updated upon completion of the investigation or upon receipt of additional relevant information.
 
Event Description
It is reported in the literature titled ¿clinical usefulness of red dichromatic imaging in hemostatic treatment during endoscopic submucosal dissection: first report from a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial¿, patients experienced adverse events during or after endoscopic submucosal dissection (esd) procedure using a single-use electrosurgical knife kd-650.Study aim: to verify the efficacy and safety of red dichromatic imaging (rdi) in hemostatic procedures during endoscopic submucosal dissection (esd).Study method: multicenter randomized controlled trial of 404 patients who underwent esd of the esophagus, stomach, colorectum.Patients who received hemostatic treatments by rdi during esd were defined as the rdi group (n¿=¿204), and those who received hemostatic treatments by white light imaging (wli) were defined as the wli group (n¿=¿200).The primary endpoint was a shortening of the hemostasis time.The secondary endpoints were a reduction of the psychological stress experienced by the endoscopist during the hemostatic treatment, a shortened treatment time, and a non-inferior perforation rate, in rdi versus wli.Results: the mean hemostasis time in rdi (n¿=¿860) was not significantly shorter than that in wli (n¿=¿1049) (62.3¿±¿108.1 vs.56.2¿±¿74.6¿s; p¿=¿0.921).The median hemostasis time was significantly longer in rdi than in wli (36.0 [18.0¿71.0] vs.28.0 [14.0¿66.0] s; p¿=¿0.001) in a sensitivity analysis.The psychological stress was significantly lower in rdi than in wli (1.71¿±¿0.935 vs.2.03¿±¿1.038; p¿<¿0.001).There was no significant difference in the esd treatment time between rdi (n¿=¿161) and wli (n¿=¿168) (58.0 [35.0¿86.0] vs.60.0 [38.0¿88.5] min; p¿=¿0.855).Conclusions: hemostatic treatment using rdi does not shorten the hemostasis time.Rdi, however, is safe to use for hemostatic procedures and reduces the psychological stress experienced by endoscopists when they perform hemostatic treatment during esd.Mild aspiration pneumonia was found in two cases in rdi and one case in wli.Perforations were found in two cases in rdi and two cases in wli.None of the four perforations were caused by the hemostatic treatment, and all were cured by conservative treatment.There was no report of olympus device malfunction in any procedure described in this literature.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being supplemented to provide additional information based on the legal manufacturer's final investigation.The device history record was unable to be reviewed for this device since the lot number was not provided.However, olympus only releases products to market that meet all manufacturing specifications and final product release criteria.Based on the results of the investigation, the relationship between the device and the adverse event cannot be confirmed.There was no complaint reported on the subject device.There is no evidence of an olympus device malfunction.Olympus will continue to monitor field performance for this device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SINGLE USE ELECTROSURGICAL KNIFE KD-650
Type of Device
SINGLE USE ELECTROSURGICAL KNIFE
Manufacturer (Section D)
OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP.
2951 ishikawa-cho
hachioji-shi, tokyo-to 192-8 507
JA  192-8507
Manufacturer Contact
kazutaka matsumoto
2951 ishikawa-cho
hachioji-shi, tokyo-to 192-8-507
JA   192-8507
426425177
MDR Report Key13713869
MDR Text Key287283919
Report Number8010047-2022-04184
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KNS
UDI-Device Identifier04953170265761
UDI-Public04953170265761
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K092309
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Study,Literature,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 08/09/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/09/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberKD-650L
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN(LITERATURE)
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received07/28/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-