• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. R3 20 DEG XLPE ACET LNR 32MM X 52MM; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, CEMENTED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. R3 20 DEG XLPE ACET LNR 32MM X 52MM; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, CEMENTED Back to Search Results
Model Number 71337652
Medical Device Problem Code Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Failure of Implant (1924); Discomfort (2330); Ambulation or Postural Difficulties (2544); Inadequate Osseointegration (2646)
Date of Event 02/01/2022
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that, on (b)(6) 2021, the patient underwent left total hip arthroplasty to improve the structure of the patient's left hip, relieve pain and improve the quality of life.The prosthesis was normal and recovered well after operation.On (b)(6) 2022, the patient felt an abnormal sound of the left hip joint, which was obvious when walking and needed to walk with a crutch.On (b)(6) 2022, a film in the outpatient department of the hospital was taken, which suggested loosening of the r3 20 deg xlpe acet lnr 32 mm x 52 mm.On (b)(6) 2022, the patient underwent surgical incision and exploration, it was found that the liner was loose and the liner buckle was worn, and also that the femoral head was worn; therefore, both components were exchanged.The patient is currently undergoing postoperative rehabilitation treatment.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Internal complaint reference: (b)(4).
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The device was not returned for evaluation but the pictures were reviewed, and they confirm that the liner was no longer in its proper orientation.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that, the provided four x-rays and photo of the explants were reviewed.The x-ray taken prior to the revision and the photo of the explants confirms that the liner was no longer in its proper orientation as reported in the event description.However, the images, do not aid in the clinical investigation of the root cause of the reported loosening of the liner and wear of the femoral head.Therefore, based on insufficient information, a thorough medical assessment could not be performed at this time but the patient impact is limited to the revision procedure.Should any additional relevant clinical information be provided, this complaint would be re-assessed.All documents and images provided as of this date have been reviewed and considered and unless noted do not contribute to the clinical/medical investigation.A review of the manufacturing records did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.A review of complaint history for the part number over the past 12 months and for the batch number based on historical data of the device did not reveal similar events for the listed device.A review of the instructions for use documents for total hip systems revealed that loosening has been identified as a adverse events in primary and revision surgery.A review of the risk management file revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.A historical review concluded that there are no prior actions related to this product and event.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.Factors and/or some potential probable causes that could contribute to the reported event have been identified as abnormal motion over time, bone degeneration, fit/sizing issue, lack of ingrowth, lifetime of device, and/or traumatic injury.The contribution of the device to the reported event could be corroborated since the liner was no longer in its proper orientation.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
R3 20 DEG XLPE ACET LNR 32MM X 52MM
Common Device Name
PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, CEMENTED
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
1450 brooks rd.
memphis TN 38116
Manufacturer (Section G)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
1450 brooks rd.
memphis TN 38116
Manufacturer Contact
holly topping
7000 west william cannon drive
austin, TX 78735
5123913905
MDR Report Key13720415
Report Number1020279-2022-01093
Device Sequence Number14608351
Product Code JDI
UDI-Device Identifier03596010598493
UDI-Public03596010598493
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryCH
PMA/510(K) Number
K113848
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2021
Device Explanted Year2022
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 03/15/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model Number71337652
Device Catalogue Number71337652
Device Lot Number20CM01438
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 02/18/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer03/11/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date03/10/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date03/15/2022
Date Device Manufactured03/02/2020
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention; Hospitalization;
Patient Age67 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-