• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 POWERPICC PROVENA 3CG 5F TL; CATHETER,INTRAVASCULAR,THERAPEUTIC,LONG-TERM GREATER THAN 30 DAYS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 POWERPICC PROVENA 3CG 5F TL; CATHETER,INTRAVASCULAR,THERAPEUTIC,LONG-TERM GREATER THAN 30 DAYS Back to Search Results
Model Number N/A
Device Problems Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings (1535); Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 01/25/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The manufacturer has received the sample and is pending evaluation.Results are expected soon.A lot history review (lhr) of refv1434 showed one other similar product complaint(s) from this lot number.The complaints for this lot number have been reported from the same facility.
 
Event Description
It was reported that picc placed using sherlock 3cg was discovered to be 6cm off in tip location, despite having been confirmed in the proper place by 3cg technology.Incorrect placement discovered by incidental x-ray that the patient received unrelated to the picc placement.No other information was provided.
 
Event Description
It was reported that picc placed using sherlock 3cg was discovered to be 6cm off in tip location, despite having been confirmed in the proper place by 3cg technology.Incorrect placement discovered by incidental x-ray that the patient received unrelated to the picc placement.No other information was provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, complaint and batch history, applicable previous investigation(s), applicable manufacturing records, ecg printout analysis and applicable fmea documents.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint of a discrepancy between the ecg printout and an incidental x-ray was inconclusive due to the sample condition.An ecg printout from a 5fr t/l powerpicc provena catheter placement was returned for evaluation.The p-wave was present, identifiable, and consistent.However, the p-wave in the external waveform was inverted.The wave did appear to peak in the intravascular waveform and does appears to be consistent with a caj placement.However, only the user would be able to tell if they inserted the picc tip deep enough to see the p-wave maximize and then start to diminish or display an initial negative deflection.Because the baseline has an inverted p-wave, the ecg should not be used for confirmation.Possible contributing factors for the inverted p-wave could be an incorrect lead placement (switched leads) or the patient may be in a junctional rhythm.A junctional rhythm may have an inverted p-wave in lead 2.With proper external lead placement (lead 2), the black lead is placed on the right shoulder and the red lead is on the left lower abdomen at the mid-axillary line.The p-wave in lead ii (lead 2) would always have an upright p-wave.Since the printout did not contain the correct p-wave in the external waveform, the instructions for use in this case would be to do a chest x-ray.In addition, without a copy of the radiographic images, a review of the images could not be independently conducted.Possible contributing factors for an ecg printout indicating the incorrect catheter tip location could include patient physiology (e.G., heart rhythm anomalies), the 3cg tcs not properly reading the stylet/ecg (e.G., noise on the signal), or clinical procedure.Possible contributing factors for actual or perceived changes in catheter tip location in the radiographic images could include imaging technique (e.G., projection, patient position, and respiratory pattern), patient movements, or catheter securement method.As the complaint could not be independently confirmed, it will be considered inconclusive.However, the complaint has been recorded and will continue to be monitored as part of ongoing trending.H3 other text : evaluation findings are in section h.11.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
POWERPICC PROVENA 3CG 5F TL
Type of Device
CATHETER,INTRAVASCULAR,THERAPEUTIC,LONG-TERM GREATER THAN 30 DAYS
Manufacturer (Section D)
C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740
605 north 5600 west
salt lake city 84116
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD REYNOSA S.A. DE C.V. -9617592
blvd. montebello #1
parque industrial colonial
reynosa, tamaulipas 88780
MX   88780
Manufacturer Contact
kayla olsen
605 north 5600 west
salt lake city 84116
8015950700
MDR Report Key13726178
MDR Text Key286992008
Report Number3006260740-2022-00696
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LJS
UDI-Device Identifier00801741112720
UDI-Public(01)00801741112720
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K053501
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/29/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/10/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberN/A
Device Catalogue NumberS1385108D
Device Lot NumberREFV1434
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/03/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received04/29/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/01/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age49 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-