• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS Back to Search Results
Model Number DIU375
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Visual Impairment (2138); Visual Disturbances (2140)
Date of Event 01/19/2022
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Unknown/asked but unavailable.The device was not returned for analysis.Therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.An attempt was made to obtain missing information; however, the account did not have the information.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the patient's vision was not crisp, had blurry distance vision, and glare at night after the implantation of the tecnis eyhance intraocular lens (iol) in the patient's right eye.The patient's outcome was myopic.The symptoms were first reported to the surgeon at 1 day post-operative (op) visit.Visual acuity (va) pre-op: 20/30 -2 and va post-op: 20/30.Lasik was done status post, but the patient's vision did not improve.Thus, an explant was performed.The incision was enlarged, however, sutures and a vitrectomy were not required.No further information was provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section d9: device available for evaluation: yes.Section d9: return to manufacturer: 3/16/2022.Section h3: device evaluated by manufacturer: yes.Device evaluation: visual inspection under magnification revealed that the complaint lens was received coated in viscoelastic residue.The lens was cleaned and, no issues related to or could have contributed to visual issues were observed.No handpiece was received as part of this return therefore, no product evaluation could be performed on the handpiece.The complaint issue was not confirmed.Based on the investigation results, there is no indication of a product deficiency or product malfunction.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS IOL
Common Device Name
LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key13726439
Report Number3012236936-2022-00611
Device Sequence Number6091053
Product Code MJP
UDI-Device Identifier05050474748347
UDI-Public(01)05050474748347(17)241205
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateFL
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2022
Device Explanted Year2022
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 04/27/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date12/05/2024
Device Model NumberDIU375
Device Catalogue NumberDIU375U215
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 02/16/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer04/25/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date03/10/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date04/27/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/05/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient SexFemale
-
-